SHARE
Facebook X Pinterest WhatsApp

IBM Makes Smarter Computing Case

One of the fundamental problems with enterprise IT is that internal IT organizations are often at war with one another. Much of that warfare is driven by the self interest of one particular group of specialists arguing in favor of one particular computing platform over another simply because that’s the platform they know best. And […]

Written By
MV
Mike Vizard
Apr 26, 2011

One of the fundamental problems with enterprise IT is that internal IT organizations are often at war with one another. Much of that warfare is driven by the self interest of one particular group of specialists arguing in favor of one particular computing platform over another simply because that’s the platform they know best. And the more applications that run on that platform, the higher their job security becomes.

The problem is that it’s difficult to develop a cohesive IT strategy when there are a lot of partisan politics involved. For that reason, IBM under the auspices of a new Smarter Computing initiative is trying to get customers to focus on the real cost of computing per class of application workload. The real issue, says Guru Rao, an IBM fellow and chief systems engineer, is that not only do too many IT organizations lack a cohesive approach to how they manage applications, they also don’t really know the true cost of processing them.

Rao says that the IBM Smarter Computing initiative is also intended to help companies reduce the size of the overall IT environment they need to manage by being a lot smarter about how they manage data. That means not only more reliance on compression and data deduplication, it means making better use of data management tools in order to reduce the number of copies of various data sets that today are routinely distributed throughout the enterprise. Each copy of those data sets, notes Rao, requires additional IT infrastructure and storage capacity to process and manage. That in turn aggravates the total cost of enterprise IT.

By being smarter about how data and applications workloads are managed, Rao contends that IT organizations will free up a significant amount of money that can be reinvested to create new innovative applications or simply dropped to the bottom line to increase the profitability of overall organization. In either case, the overall value of the IT organization to the rest of the business is greatly enhanced.

There’s no silver bullet that will transform the operations of any given IT organization overnight. But there is lots of room for steady improvement once companies get past the politics of IT to focus on the application workload requirements irrespective of the underlying IT infrastructure.
 

MV

Michael Vizard is a seasoned IT journalist, with nearly 30 years of experience writing and editing about enterprise IT issues. He is a contributor to publications including Programmableweb, IT Business Edge, CIOinsight and UBM Tech. He formerly was editorial director for Ziff-Davis Enterprise, where he launched the company’s custom content division, and has also served as editor in chief for CRN and InfoWorld. He also has held editorial positions at PC Week, Computerworld and Digital Review.

Recommended for you...

Observability: Why It’s a Red Hot Tech Term
Tom Taulli
Jul 19, 2022
Top GRC Platforms & Tools in 2022
Jira vs. ServiceNow: Features, Pricing, and Comparison
Surajdeep Singh
Jun 17, 2022
IT Business Edge Logo

The go-to resource for IT professionals from all corners of the tech world looking for cutting edge technology solutions that solve their unique business challenges. We aim to help these professionals grow their knowledge base and authority in their field with the top news and trends in the technology space.

Property of TechnologyAdvice. © 2025 TechnologyAdvice. All Rights Reserved

Advertiser Disclosure: Some of the products that appear on this site are from companies from which TechnologyAdvice receives compensation. This compensation may impact how and where products appear on this site including, for example, the order in which they appear. TechnologyAdvice does not include all companies or all types of products available in the marketplace.