SHARE
Facebook X Pinterest WhatsApp

MDM’s Business Justification Isn’t Always Enough

Four Best Practices for Accelerating Time-to-Value of Master Data Management Friday, I wrote about pursuing a data strategy that lets you play the short game while focusing on winning the long game. I used Google’s recent re-entry into health care data as an example. Well. I wish I’d read this piece by Jim Harris before […]

Written By
thumbnail
Loraine Lawson
Loraine Lawson
Sep 23, 2013
Slide Show

Four Best Practices for Accelerating Time-to-Value of Master Data Management

Friday, I wrote about pursuing a data strategy that lets you play the short game while focusing on winning the long game. I used Google’s recent re-entry into health care data as an example.

Well. I wish I’d read this piece by Jim Harris before I’d written that post. But, as Harris points out so well, sometimes no business justification—large or small—will work.

Harris is what some call a data quality thought leader. I am somewhat averse to the term thought leader, so I would classify him as a data veteran with 20 years of enterprise data management experience in the industry. He’s an independent consultant—which in and of itself is becoming unusual—and he runs the wonderful Obsessive-Compulsive Data Quality blog. Plus, he loves a clever word play, so you know he’s a smart guy.

Harris is writing a series on factors that can thwart master data management (MDM) initiatives, which he calls the “antimatters of MDM.”

The first MDM-stopping problem CIOs may face is the “business justification paradox.” Often, he writes, pundits talk about the business justification for MDM—or really, anything—as if it is the key to convincing executives to invest in a solution.

Alas—that’s just not true. Sometimes, you can make a complete and thorough business justification and still be rejected, he states:

“Because the harsh reality is that even a legitimate business-justified solution, which in the long run will reduce costs, mitigate risks and increase revenues, will in the immediate future only increase costs, increase risks and decrease revenues. This is a difficult sell to an organization’s shareholders.”

It seems downright unfair, even wrong, but as Harris points out, we’re all guilty of indulging in the short-term at the expense of what’s good for us in the long run.

Google proves that starting small as you build toward a bigger strategy can work, but that’s Google. For the rest of us, the hard truth is, in this economy, sometimes even starting small is still too expensive.

Recommended for you...

How Revolutionary Are Meta’s AI Efforts?
Kashyap Vyas
Aug 8, 2022
Data Lake Strategy Options: From Self-Service to Full-Service
Chad Kime
Aug 8, 2022
What’s New With Google Vertex AI?
Kashyap Vyas
Jul 26, 2022
Data Lake vs. Data Warehouse: What’s the Difference?
Aminu Abdullahi
Jul 25, 2022
IT Business Edge Logo

The go-to resource for IT professionals from all corners of the tech world looking for cutting edge technology solutions that solve their unique business challenges. We aim to help these professionals grow their knowledge base and authority in their field with the top news and trends in the technology space.

Property of TechnologyAdvice. © 2025 TechnologyAdvice. All Rights Reserved

Advertiser Disclosure: Some of the products that appear on this site are from companies from which TechnologyAdvice receives compensation. This compensation may impact how and where products appear on this site including, for example, the order in which they appear. TechnologyAdvice does not include all companies or all types of products available in the marketplace.