SHARE
Facebook X Pinterest WhatsApp

Cisco Partners with SGI to Scale Up In-Memory Applications

The Rise of Integrated IT Infrastructure Systems: Top Enterprise Use Cases While scale-out IT architectures are all the rage these days, there are still quite a few new and old applications that benefit more from scale-up architectures like, for example, SAP S/4 enterprise resource planning (ERP) applications running on the HANA in-memory computing platform. There […]

Written By
MV
Mike Vizard
Jun 29, 2016
Slide Show

The Rise of Integrated IT Infrastructure Systems: Top Enterprise Use Cases

While scale-out IT architectures are all the rage these days, there are still quite a few new and old applications that benefit more from scale-up architectures like, for example, SAP S/4 enterprise resource planning (ERP) applications running on the HANA in-memory computing platform. There are instances where running HANA applications on a scale-out architecture is fine. But when it comes to combining transaction processing and real-time analytics, scale-up architectures are going to be required.

Cisco has become the latest systems vendor to decide to resell a platform from SGI that is specifically designed to scale up applications in memory. Earlier this year SGI struck a similar alliance with Dell, and Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE) has an OEM agreement in place surrounding an eight-socket appliance that HPE intends to build based on SGI server technology.

Bill Dunmire, head of product management and marketing for SGI’s High Performance Data Analytics group, says the issue with scale-out architectures in many mission-critical use cases is that all those separate compute and storage engines have to be networked. That’s fine for two, four and even eight socket systems, but all that additional latency isn’t present in a SGI UV 300H system that is purpose-built to scale up using Intel Xeon-class processors.

Of course, Cisco, Dell and others will continue to sell scale-out systems because there are many scenarios where that architecture makes sense. But when it comes to in-memory computing, many of the precepts that companies such as SGI originally developed for the high-performance computing (HPC) market now apply to the high-performance sector of traditional enterprise data centers.

Whether an IT organization opts to acquire an SGI platform directly from SGI or through one of its OEM partners will depend on the relationship it has with a particular vendor and the level of support required. But one thing is certain: The one-size-fits-all notion regarding application workloads in the data center can be filed away with every other piece of IT gospel that has turned out to be a myth.

Save

MV

Michael Vizard is a seasoned IT journalist, with nearly 30 years of experience writing and editing about enterprise IT issues. He is a contributor to publications including Programmableweb, IT Business Edge, CIOinsight and UBM Tech. He formerly was editorial director for Ziff-Davis Enterprise, where he launched the company’s custom content division, and has also served as editor in chief for CRN and InfoWorld. He also has held editorial positions at PC Week, Computerworld and Digital Review.

Recommended for you...

Hyperscalers: Will They Upend the Mainframe Market?
Tom Taulli
Nov 22, 2021
PagerDuty Report: Stress on IT Teams on the Rise
Mike Vizard
Jul 30, 2021
VMware Adds Subscription Option for VMware Cloud
Mike Vizard
Mar 31, 2021
IT Business Edge Logo

The go-to resource for IT professionals from all corners of the tech world looking for cutting edge technology solutions that solve their unique business challenges. We aim to help these professionals grow their knowledge base and authority in their field with the top news and trends in the technology space.

Property of TechnologyAdvice. © 2025 TechnologyAdvice. All Rights Reserved

Advertiser Disclosure: Some of the products that appear on this site are from companies from which TechnologyAdvice receives compensation. This compensation may impact how and where products appear on this site including, for example, the order in which they appear. TechnologyAdvice does not include all companies or all types of products available in the marketplace.