The Persistence of Silos: Why Do We Keep Building Them?

Share it on Twitter  
Share it on Facebook  
Share it on Linked in  

"Already I prophesied to my countrymen all their disasters. Ever since that fault I could persuade no on of aught."

- Cassandra in "Agamemnon" by Aeschylus, line 1203


Not to sound all Oprah-like, but I'm trying to make my peace with silos. As someone who focuses on integration, this is no easy task. I feel like Cassandra, issuing warnings no one will heed.


Just now, I was reading TDWI's just-published, free report, "Next Generation Master Data Management," and what should I see but this little depressing item:

44% We practice MDM, but in silos per department, data domain, or application.

This is out of 369 organizations surveyed, close to half developed MDM - an approach predicated on integration and dissolving data silos - in silos.


But that's not all. Even though many organizations want to push MDM hubs to the next level and make it a truly enterprise-wide resource, they're struggling to do so thanks in no small part to a lack of cross-functional cooperation. That ranked third in the top five challenges to enterprise-wide MDM, followed by two issues that are actually related to it: a lack of executive sponsorship and a lack of data governance/stewardship.


It's like we just can't learn. Silos created the very problem MDM is supposed to solve, and what do we do? We build MDM in silos.


And it's not just MDM. It's just about everything that happens, including things that would seem innately anti-silo, such as data governance.


I find it very frustrating. But I'm also getting older, and learning to accept the things I cannot change, as they say. Recently, I've started to wonder if silos are something we cannot change.


Oh, sure, there are integration projects that succeed in de-siloing data, applications and systems. It's not that we have to wave the white flag and just give up on integration.


But maybe silos are just a natural, practical, dare I say reasonable, way to incubate new programs, new projects, new approaches and new applications.


Even data people - who should know better - do this.


Dylan Jones, founder of Data Quality Pro and Data Migration Pro, recently pondered whether organizations are creating silos or islands of expertise, particularly when it comes to information management.


John Owens, who created the Integrated Modelling Method, originally voiced this concern in a LinkedIn data quality forum.


"John believes that in many ways we've gone backwards," writes Jones. "We often have limited unification between teams involved in information management. Business modeling and data modeling are rarely carried out correctly and many organizations have no functional models or logical models that reflect the business they're actually in."


Jones adds that recent visits to organizations within both the private and public sector show it's a real concern. He found out-of-date physical data schemas, no logical modeling and no target models to guide their business environment's evolution.


"But is this a blip?" he asks.


Given the persistence of silos, I'm inclined to think not. But am I just getting cynical from writing about integration? Have I just seen one too many stories warning about new silos and the lack of enterprise-wide strategies?


I'd love to hear your thoughts. You can post below, or send me a message on Twitter or LinkedIn. (And, yes, I'm aware of the irony of asking for responses in siloed applications.)