Cleveland Rolling out Welcome Mat for Foreign Investment

Ann All

Back in April, I wrote about efforts in some U.S. cities, including Cleveland, to attract more educated workers and foreign investment. The idea being promoted by Cleveland immigration attorney Richard Herman and others is to establish high-skill immigration zones where companies making investments would not be subject to H-1B restrictions.


A precedent exists in EB-5, an employment-based visa category created by Congress in 1990 and regulated by the Citizenship and Immigration Services division of the Department of Homeland Security. Foreigners who invest money in new commercial projects that create 10 new full-time jobs can receive a Green Card through the EB-5 program. In economically disadvantaged areas like Cleveland, the investment level begins at $500,000.


An effort to attract foreign investment to Cleveland is still under way, according to a recent cleveland.com story, which details the city's efforts to establish a Talent Blueprint Project, with the aim of luring more foreign students, workers and entrepreneurs. It offers the example of Asis Benarjie, a native of India who founded Ovation Polymers in Medina, Ohio, in 2004. Since then, the business has expanded its work force to 40.


The article also mentions a frequently-cited Duke University study that found foreign-born entrepreneurs founded one of every four new companies in technology and engineering during the decade ending in 2005. (The number was one in seven in Ohio.) A newer study from the Ewing Marion Kauffman Foundation also found that immigrant entrepreneurial activity grew from 2006-2007, while the rate of activity for native-born Americans remained flat.


The Cleveland Council on World Affairs intends to apply for consideration as an EB-5 region, a designation already enjoyed by about two dozen other U.S. metro areas, including Milwaukee and Pittsburgh.


In a parallel effort, the council wants to adopt the immigration-zone idea that would eliminate H-1B caps. Mark Santo, who leads the council, says the lack of a cap, combined with the area's low cost of living, schools such as Case Western Reserve University, and perks like free business-incubator space could attract tech employees who have amassed wealth through stock options by working for companies like Google and now want to start their own businesses.


Economic incentives notwithstanding, areas like Cleveland will need to foster a more welcoming attitude toward foreign investors, say several folks interviewed in the story. A low cost of living is obviously not what attracts immigrants to areas like New York and California, but they do offer atmospheres that promote diversity.


Ken Kovach, head of the International Community Council, which represents 120 nationalities in the Cleveland area, recommends installing signage in foreign languages at the city's airport and adding other "symbols that would pique international interest." It'll take political savvy to get this done in regions like Cleveland, where many residents deeply resent the loss of manufacturing jobs to low-cost countries like China.

Subscribe to our Newsletters

Sign up now and get the best business technology insights direct to your inbox.


Add Comment      Leave a comment on this blog post
Jul 15, 2008 11:45 AM Weaver Weaver  says:
Seems like employment based immigration should be a privilege, based upon a percentage of the prior year's employment growth. Maybe if the privilege was revoked, for lack of performance, business would not be so eager to send entire processes offshore.(There is also a program for M.D. who will practice in undeserved communities suffering from a complete lack of interest. ) Let's see if this will post properly. BLS Employment Growth over (NonInstCiv) Population Growth by Decade:1950sPopulation Growth = 11,516,000Employment Growth = 7,215,000 (63%)1960sPopulation Growth = 19,449,000Employment Growth = 13,862,000 (71%)1970sPopulation Growth = 30,811,000Employment Growth = 21,224,000 (69%)1980sPopulation Growth = 20,865,000Employment Growth = 17,685,000 (85%)1990sPopulation Growth = 21,667,000Employment Growth = 16,998,000 (78%)2000sPopulation Growth = 24,795,000Employment Growth = 11,953,000 (48%) http://immigration-weaver.blogspot.com/2008/07/last-centurys-immigration-policy-no.html Reply
Jul 15, 2008 5:21 PM john g john g  says:
You should read this very interesting article http://american.com/archive/2008/july-august-magazine-contents/america2019s-other-immigration-crisisIt adds to what you wrote.John Reply
Jul 23, 2008 4:37 PM Laura Gullett Laura Gullett  says:
I have a higher education, live in Cleveland, but am unemployed and for some time now about to be homeless. Reading this article really ticks me off when I'm right here and have looked for work many times, posted my resume online many times, but not even an inquiry. So if it is not my sex of being a female in the technology sector, or my age of 47, then what is it? I've been on my own many years and not naive to think those factors are not part of the problem. People only seem to care about someone if they are under age 35 and have a political system around them. My long technical history is on my website at www.skybits.com.Laura Reply

Post a comment





(Maximum characters: 1200). You have 1200 characters left.




Subscribe Daily Edge Newsletters

Sign up now and get the best business technology insights direct to your inbox.

Subscribe Daily Edge Newsletters

Sign up now and get the best business technology insights direct to your inbox.