<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:clearspace="http://www.jivesoftware.com/xmlns/clearspace/rss" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:opensearch="http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearch/1.1/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>ITBE: Message List - Centralized or Decentralized Model?</title>
    <link>http://www.itbusinessedge.com/cm/community/kn?view=discussions</link>
    <description>Most recent forum messages</description>
    <language>en</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2009 14:07:04 GMT</pubDate>
    <generator>Clearspace 2.5.5 (http://jivesoftware.com/products/clearspace/)</generator>
    <dc:date>2009-05-30T14:07:04Z</dc:date>
    <dc:language>en</dc:language>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Centralized or Decentralized Model?</title>
      <link>http://www.itbusinessedge.com/cm/message/1437?tstart=0#1437</link>
      <description>Also a centralized model makes the most sense in situations where the RTO is critical say in the case of a bank, they need to get back on track as quickly as possible. or even on online retailer.</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2009 14:07:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>webadmin@itbusinessedge.com</author>
      <guid>http://www.itbusinessedge.com/cm/message/1437?tstart=0#1437</guid>
      <dc:date>2009-05-30T14:07:03Z</dc:date>
      <clearspace:dateToText>5 months, 3 weeks ago</clearspace:dateToText>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Centralized or Decentralized Model?</title>
      <link>http://www.itbusinessedge.com/cm/message/1435?tstart=0#1435</link>
      <description>I agree Tim, However, in choosing a centralized or decentralized system , we need to take into account the type and size of the business in order to determine the system that makes the most sense. Data recovery may be faster and more cost effective on a</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2009 05:21:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>webadmin@itbusinessedge.com</author>
      <guid>http://www.itbusinessedge.com/cm/message/1435?tstart=0#1435</guid>
      <dc:date>2009-05-30T05:21:34Z</dc:date>
      <clearspace:dateToText>5 months, 3 weeks ago</clearspace:dateToText>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Centralized or Decentralized Model?</title>
      <link>http://www.itbusinessedge.com/cm/message/1426?tstart=0#1426</link>
      <description>It is important NOT to confuse centralized architecture whith centralized topology. A centralized network architecture means that there is a structured (logical) hierarchy for system configuration and management. It does not mean that a centralized</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 02:15:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>webadmin@itbusinessedge.com</author>
      <guid>http://www.itbusinessedge.com/cm/message/1426?tstart=0#1426</guid>
      <dc:date>2009-05-29T02:15:19Z</dc:date>
      <clearspace:dateToText>5 months, 3 weeks ago</clearspace:dateToText>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Centralized or Decentralized Model?</title>
      <link>http://www.itbusinessedge.com/cm/message/1425?tstart=0#1425</link>
      <description>Nate, I agree with you in certain situations.  But if you have multiple facilities not all the systems can work independently of a server hosting it.  For example, if the database server goes down, having the other facilities on fat client may not do</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 01:53:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>webadmin@itbusinessedge.com</author>
      <guid>http://www.itbusinessedge.com/cm/message/1425?tstart=0#1425</guid>
      <dc:date>2009-05-29T01:53:03Z</dc:date>
      <clearspace:dateToText>5 months, 3 weeks ago</clearspace:dateToText>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Centralized or Decentralized Model?</title>
      <link>http://www.itbusinessedge.com/cm/message/1424?tstart=0#1424</link>
      <description>For disaster recovery purposes I belive that a decentralized model would be better equipped to deal with a failure at one or more locations. If one location were to fail, one could easily have backup systems already in place to failover to. While</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 13:16:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>webadmin@itbusinessedge.com</author>
      <guid>http://www.itbusinessedge.com/cm/message/1424?tstart=0#1424</guid>
      <dc:date>2009-05-28T13:16:00Z</dc:date>
      <clearspace:dateToText>5 months, 3 weeks ago</clearspace:dateToText>
      <clearspace:replyCount>1</clearspace:replyCount>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Centralized or Decentralized Model?</title>
      <link>http://www.itbusinessedge.com/cm/message/1422?tstart=0#1422</link>
      <description>For the business survivability, it is best to use decentralized approach. Like they say,"don't put all your eggs in one basket." Let's take the situation of 9/11's tragedy where some firms went bankrupt. They were not able to recover after the 9/11's</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 05:22:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>webadmin@itbusinessedge.com</author>
      <guid>http://www.itbusinessedge.com/cm/message/1422?tstart=0#1422</guid>
      <dc:date>2009-05-28T05:22:54Z</dc:date>
      <clearspace:dateToText>5 months, 3 weeks ago</clearspace:dateToText>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Centralized or Decentralized Model?</title>
      <link>http://www.itbusinessedge.com/cm/message/1421?tstart=0#1421</link>
      <description>It is obvious that if you were to recover an organization from a disaster it is best to use a centralized model. This is true if only all the necessary backup data is available. The recovery process is easier and faster. The most important of</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 03:50:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>webadmin@itbusinessedge.com</author>
      <guid>http://www.itbusinessedge.com/cm/message/1421?tstart=0#1421</guid>
      <dc:date>2009-05-28T03:50:02Z</dc:date>
      <clearspace:dateToText>5 months, 3 weeks ago</clearspace:dateToText>
      <clearspace:replyCount>1</clearspace:replyCount>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Centralized or Decentralized Model?</title>
      <link>http://www.itbusinessedge.com/cm/message/1420?tstart=0#1420</link>
      <description>Disaster recovery can be performed as a result of so many unforeseen circumstances, some of which can range from just data corruption, lost of critical servers or even an entire building or business complex. When implementing a Business Continuity Plan,</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 20:06:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>webadmin@itbusinessedge.com</author>
      <guid>http://www.itbusinessedge.com/cm/message/1420?tstart=0#1420</guid>
      <dc:date>2009-05-27T20:06:26Z</dc:date>
      <clearspace:dateToText>5 months, 4 weeks ago</clearspace:dateToText>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Centralized or Decentralized Model?</title>
      <link>http://www.itbusinessedge.com/cm/message/1411?tstart=0#1411</link>
      <description>Well, this is a debate for the ages. I have seen several poinient reasons to use a Cetralized approach. I can agree if we bring into the thought process items like databases and specific applications. These really should drive the schema of your</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 14:46:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>webadmin@itbusinessedge.com</author>
      <guid>http://www.itbusinessedge.com/cm/message/1411?tstart=0#1411</guid>
      <dc:date>2009-05-27T14:46:12Z</dc:date>
      <clearspace:dateToText>5 months, 4 weeks ago</clearspace:dateToText>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Centralized or Decentralized Model?</title>
      <link>http://www.itbusinessedge.com/cm/message/1410?tstart=0#1410</link>
      <description>Warrick makes some valid points. If you use a decentralized model it will be less cost effective for your company. It will take more time to try and figure out whatbsystems and aplications need to be brought back online after a disaster. Even if you</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 12:02:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>webadmin@itbusinessedge.com</author>
      <guid>http://www.itbusinessedge.com/cm/message/1410?tstart=0#1410</guid>
      <dc:date>2009-05-27T12:02:50Z</dc:date>
      <clearspace:dateToText>5 months, 4 weeks ago</clearspace:dateToText>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Centralized or Decentralized Model?</title>
      <link>http://www.itbusinessedge.com/cm/message/1409?tstart=0#1409</link>
      <description>A centralized model would be best. As long as you are doing backups regularly; a centralized model offers control, efficiency, and economy. Its centralized control decreases technical risk. A decentralized model can waste time and cause cost to increase.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 11:54:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>webadmin@itbusinessedge.com</author>
      <guid>http://www.itbusinessedge.com/cm/message/1409?tstart=0#1409</guid>
      <dc:date>2009-05-27T11:54:31Z</dc:date>
      <clearspace:dateToText>5 months, 4 weeks ago</clearspace:dateToText>
      <clearspace:replyCount>1</clearspace:replyCount>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Centralized or Decentralized Model?</title>
      <link>http://www.itbusinessedge.com/cm/message/1408?tstart=0#1408</link>
      <description>I believe that a centralized model would be ideal for recovery of a high impact organizational "disaster". Reasons for choosing the centralized model are: &amp;nbsp; 1. Allows for streamlined command and control of personnel coordination. Technical</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 02:56:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>webadmin@itbusinessedge.com</author>
      <guid>http://www.itbusinessedge.com/cm/message/1408?tstart=0#1408</guid>
      <dc:date>2009-05-27T02:56:28Z</dc:date>
      <clearspace:dateToText>5 months, 4 weeks ago</clearspace:dateToText>
      <clearspace:replyCount>1</clearspace:replyCount>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Centralized or Decentralized Model?</title>
      <link>http://www.itbusinessedge.com/cm/message/1407?tstart=0#1407</link>
      <description>Choosing a specific scenario like healthcare I would choose centralized, provided that it is done correctly.  Since doctors, nurses, and other staff rely on the health systems being operational having decentralized workstations would not be of much use</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 02:28:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>webadmin@itbusinessedge.com</author>
      <guid>http://www.itbusinessedge.com/cm/message/1407?tstart=0#1407</guid>
      <dc:date>2009-05-27T02:28:36Z</dc:date>
      <clearspace:dateToText>5 months, 4 weeks ago</clearspace:dateToText>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Centralized or Decentralized Model?</title>
      <link>http://www.itbusinessedge.com/cm/message/1406?tstart=0#1406</link>
      <description>Given the current state of technology, which model would be more desirable if you had to recover an organization in a disaster, a centralized model or a decentralized model? Why?</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 00:23:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>webadmin@itbusinessedge.com</author>
      <guid>http://www.itbusinessedge.com/cm/message/1406?tstart=0#1406</guid>
      <dc:date>2009-05-27T00:23:52Z</dc:date>
      <clearspace:dateToText>5 months, 4 weeks ago</clearspace:dateToText>
      <clearspace:replyCount>13</clearspace:replyCount>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

