In my earlier post, "Taxation, Immigration Laws Need to Catch Up with Crowdsourcing," I wrote about work being done and income being generated over the Internet without any real attention being paid to the collection of tax on that income. That will assuredly change, and the change may well be driven by state governments growing increasingly desperate for revenue.
It is, after all, state governments that are busily reviving the on-again, off-again issue of sales tax on purchases over the Internet. Washingtonpost.com reported on Sunday that about a dozen states are eyeing legislation to force online retailers to collect state sales tax, with the on-again focus being driven by the recession:
In 2008, as the Great Recession gripped the nation, New York passed the first law requiring online retailers to collect sales tax from residents by counting local Web site operators who direct traffic to sites such as Amazon as their physical presence in the state. The law became known as the Amazon tax, and Rhode Island and North Carolina soon passed similar versions.
Online retailers have no intention of going down without a fight, hoping to maintain the price advantage they have over brick-and-mortar outlets for as long as they can. As the washingtonpost.com article noted, Amazon is leading the charge:
Amazon retaliated by challenging the law's assertion that local Web site operators are part of its sales team -- the company considers them independent advertisers -- and the case is still winding its way through state courts. In Rhode Island and North Carolina, Amazon ended all contracts with local Web site operators, which one trade group said cut their revenue in half. Amazon has also sent letters threatening similar moves in states that have debated such bills, including Virginia.
Amazon is also playing the privacy card, claiming that a North Carolina effort to identify taxable sales by means of an audit of online retailers is unconstitutional. According to an article on nytimes.com on Sunday, Amazon is portraying itself and its customers as victims of an overreaching government:
Amazon's lawyers say the Constitution protects the company so that it "may sell - and customers may read, hear or view - a broad range of popular and unpopular expressive materials with the customers' private content choices protected from unnecessary government scrutiny. "To comply with their demand will reveal the personal preferences of North Carolina consumers," Amazon said in a statement. "Customers who fear that their purchases will not be private are less likely to purchase books, movies, music or other items that might be personal, sensitive or controversial," the company argued.
What's becoming apparent is that it isn't just sales tax that online operations will be fighting to stave off. As for-profit crowdsourcing grows in popularity, those companies will be just as eager to combat government demands for payment of tax on income generated from work performed over the Internet.
No doubt, Amazon will be on the front lines of that battle, too. Its crowdsourcing operation, Mechanical Turk, pays money to workers who perform piecemeal work on projects, and who are as unlikely to voluntarily pay income tax on their earnings as they are to pay sales tax on their purchases.
Mechanical Turk and other for-profit crowdsourcing operations, such as CrowdFlower and CloudCrowd, have every reason to want to maintain the de facto income-tax-free status quo as a competitive advantage over traditional manpower providers. But they should be prepared for battle with state governments that will either be emboldened by victory on the sales tax battlefield, or made even more desperate by defeat.