Has Anonymous Moved to a New Level of Hacktivism?

Sue Marquette Poremba
Slide Show

The Cost of Cyber Crime

Cyber attacks continue to occur frequently and result in serious financial consequences for businesses and government institutions.

"Anonymous is out for blood." That was the text message I got from my son last night after word came out that the hacking group had attacked government websites after the file-sharing site Megaupload was shut down. (In full disclosure, my son works as a network security admin, which is why we text each other about security news.)


After the attacks on the Department of Justice and the FBI, as well as entertainment sites, Anonymous bragged on its Twitter account. According to CNN:

We Anonymous are launching our largest attack ever on government and music industry sites. Lulz. The FBI didn't think they would get away with this did they? They should have expected us.

With the growing outrage over bills in Congress, like SOPA, that are aimed to stop illegal downloading of intellectual and creative properties, and the recent "blackout" of sites like Wikipedia in protest, it's no surprise that Anonymous was lurking around the corner, ready to strike. And it is no surprise that the strike comes the day after the other online protests - that way, Anonymous gets its attention.


I got this email message from Rob Rachwald, director of security strategy at Imperva Labs, telling me that Imperva is tracking chatter about the Anonymous DDoS attacks to see if there is any kind of sustained retaliation in light of the takedown of Megaupload. Rachwald said:

DDoS is the internet what the Billy club is to gang warfare: simple, cheap, unsophisticated and effective. But DDoS lends itself well to the Anonymous model which relies on crowd sourcing. During Operation Payback, Anonymous inspired an army of thousands in an attempt to bring numerous commercial sites. In this case, they're boasting "5,600 DDoS zealots blasting at once."

This morning, I came across an article at PC World that wondered if Anonymous had crossed the line with this particular attack. The article pointed out that perhaps the group strayed from its roots of volunteer hacktivism:

According to a story being reported on Gawker.com, Anonymous is resorting to phishing attack style trickery to dupe people into unwittingly joining the cause. A link being shared across Twitter and in Anonymous chat rooms is allegedly loading the Anonymous DDoS tool LOIC (Low Orbit Ion Cannon), and commandeering PCs to flood the target sites with traffic.

My son may be right in his quick assessment, but the question is, why now? Why this particular cause? And is this change in tactics a permanent new twist for Anonymous or a one-time thing? Unfortunately, only time - and Anonymous' next course of action - will provide any definitive answers.

Add Comment      Leave a comment on this blog post
Jan 21, 2012 9:43 AM Don Dilly Don Dilly  says:

You ask 'why now?' for anonymous to attack the day after the anti SOPA protests.

You would be better off asking why the FBI chose to unseal the inditement of megaupload and shut them down within 24 hours of SOPA falling.

The simple matter is that the MPAA and RIAA have bought and paid for the parasites that infest the swampland known as Washington DC and they want results. The Megaupload bust was the authorities way of  cocking a snoop at anti Sopa campaigners by showing the law isnt needed.

In a nutshell once the FBI made their move, it was business as usual. The fbi hit hard, anonymous responded in kind.

The US authorities really need to wake up as the global collateral damage of their internet policies will have far reaching effects on US dominance in internet administration, global banking transactions and internet services.

One significant change has been Anonymous's gradual move in priority from the MPAA and RIAA who are there for the dual purpose of peddling propanda and bribing politicians while acting as a public lightning rod to deflect publlic anger away from the labels and studios. Anonymous is increasingly attacking the labels,studios and government bodies and those that associate themselves with them.

Jan 21, 2012 11:35 AM Austin Hoffman Austin Hoffman  says:

Good! THEY DESERVE IT!! it's all BS...SOPA/PIPA were junk + MU arrest was unfair + I don't think swizz he has any legal connections to MU...imo it was all fabbed up to get other celebrity endorsements.

p.s. looks like someone is pissed - FBI vs ANONYMOUS video:


Jan 24, 2012 6:04 AM franklin franklin  says:

Hacktivism which is a portmanteau of hack and activism is the use of computers and computer networks as a means of protest to promote political ends.Hard-line hacktivists supporting the worldwide Occupy movements may also drop the Anonymous label and reinvent itself  as "Cyberoccupiers".


Post a comment





(Maximum characters: 1200). You have 1200 characters left.



Subscribe to our Newsletters

Sign up now and get the best business technology insights direct to your inbox.