<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:clearspace="http://www.jivesoftware.com/xmlns/clearspace/rss" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:opensearch="http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearch/1.1/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Loraine Lawson</title>
    <link>http://www.itbusinessedge.com/cm/blogs/lawson</link>
    <description>Comment Feed for Loraine Lawson</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 11:52:11 GMT</pubDate>
    <generator>Clearspace 2.5.5 (http://jivesoftware.com/products/clearspace/)</generator>
    <dc:date>2009-11-05T11:52:11Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>RE:&amp;nbsp;Semantic Tech's Implications for the Enterprise</title>
      <link>http://www.itbusinessedge.com/cm/blogs/lawson/semantic-techs-implications-for-the-enterprise/?cs=37250#comment-33935</link>
      <description>We've put the "Rise of the Semantic Enterprise" issue of Cutter IT Journal up on our site as a PDF download (it's free but requires registration). Mitchell Ummel was the guest editor, and the issue provides a great look from a variety of angles of the</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 11:52:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>Kim Leonard</author>
      <guid>http://www.itbusinessedge.com/cm/blogs/lawson/semantic-techs-implications-for-the-enterprise/?cs=37250#comment-33935</guid>
      <dc:date>2009-11-05T11:52:11Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE:&amp;nbsp;Much Ado About the SOA Manifesto</title>
      <link>http://www.itbusinessedge.com/cm/blogs/lawson/much-ado-about-the-soa-manifesto/?cs=37135#comment-33928</link>
      <description>I think there were quite a few holes in the manifesto.&amp;nbsp; I addressed them in a recent blog post:  http://soa-today.blogspot.com/2009/11/soa-manifesto-value-statement-critique.html</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 21:33:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>Jordan Braunstein</author>
      <guid>http://www.itbusinessedge.com/cm/blogs/lawson/much-ado-about-the-soa-manifesto/?cs=37135#comment-33928</guid>
      <dc:date>2009-11-04T21:33:40Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE:&amp;nbsp;Magic Quadrant Good First Stop for Info on SOA Governance Products</title>
      <link>http://www.itbusinessedge.com/cm/blogs/lawson/magic-quadrant-good-first-stop-for-info-on-soa-governance-products/?cs=16050#comment-33925</link>
      <description>If you're looking for an over priced product the gartner is the place. But if you're looking for a cost-effective and comprehensive product then do the research your self through google etc.... &amp;nbsp; We are using JaxView SOA governance tool. Its the</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 17:51:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>James Morran</author>
      <guid>http://www.itbusinessedge.com/cm/blogs/lawson/magic-quadrant-good-first-stop-for-info-on-soa-governance-products/?cs=16050#comment-33925</guid>
      <dc:date>2009-11-04T17:51:52Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE:&amp;nbsp;SOA Governance Tools Simplified</title>
      <link>http://www.itbusinessedge.com/cm/blogs/lawson/soa-governance-tools-simplified/?cs=16071#comment-33924</link>
      <description>We were looking for a cost effective tool for SOA runtime governance. We needed security and visibility. Ultimatley we found JaxView to be the most comprehensive and cost effective tool out there. It integrates easily with many ESB's and the multiple</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 17:48:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>James Morran</author>
      <guid>http://www.itbusinessedge.com/cm/blogs/lawson/soa-governance-tools-simplified/?cs=16071#comment-33924</guid>
      <dc:date>2009-11-04T17:48:35Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE:&amp;nbsp;Much Ado About the SOA Manifesto</title>
      <link>http://www.itbusinessedge.com/cm/blogs/lawson/much-ado-about-the-soa-manifesto/?cs=37135#comment-33900</link>
      <description>As always, Loraine, you summed it up brilliantly. Our take is here:  http://bit.ly/2ey5Cp</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 21:43:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>Alex Neihaus</author>
      <guid>http://www.itbusinessedge.com/cm/blogs/lawson/much-ado-about-the-soa-manifesto/?cs=37135#comment-33900</guid>
      <dc:date>2009-11-03T21:43:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE:&amp;nbsp;Could Mashups Solve Problems Plaguing Business Intelligence?</title>
      <link>http://www.itbusinessedge.com/cm/blogs/lawson/could-mashups-solve-problems-plaguing-business-intelligence/?cs=37179#comment-33880</link>
      <description>The problem is that many organizations today purchase BI solutions for 100K and more and then asked where is my ROI? &amp;nbsp; If on the first place they would not spend huge amount of money on the old generation big systems like BO, Cognos, Panorama etc.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 08:39:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>Shared Intelligence</author>
      <guid>http://www.itbusinessedge.com/cm/blogs/lawson/could-mashups-solve-problems-plaguing-business-intelligence/?cs=37179#comment-33880</guid>
      <dc:date>2009-11-03T08:39:56Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE:&amp;nbsp;Much Ado About the SOA Manifesto</title>
      <link>http://www.itbusinessedge.com/cm/blogs/lawson/much-ado-about-the-soa-manifesto/?cs=37135#comment-33858</link>
      <description>I agree with most of what folks are saying here not a lot of actual practitioners versus vendor/consultants but I believe Dr. Webber got this part backwards - "He also took aim at what the document said about prioritizing “intrinsic interoperability</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 15:49:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>Mark Griffin</author>
      <guid>http://www.itbusinessedge.com/cm/blogs/lawson/much-ado-about-the-soa-manifesto/?cs=37135#comment-33858</guid>
      <dc:date>2009-10-31T15:49:55Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE:&amp;nbsp;What's Holding Up Semantic Integration?</title>
      <link>http://www.itbusinessedge.com/cm/blogs/lawson/whats-holding-up-semantic-integration/?cs=37002#comment-33846</link>
      <description>Interesting dialog.&amp;nbsp; We think that semantic data integration is a very important topic and a key enabler for any company that wants to deal with the crucial pain point in data integration -- how to simplify data mapping design, enable business rule</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 14:51:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>Michael Waclawiczek</author>
      <guid>http://www.itbusinessedge.com/cm/blogs/lawson/whats-holding-up-semantic-integration/?cs=37002#comment-33846</guid>
      <dc:date>2009-10-30T14:51:56Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE:&amp;nbsp;Applying Mashups to Business Intelligence</title>
      <link>http://www.itbusinessedge.com/cm/blogs/lawson/applying-mashups-to-business-intelligence/?cs=37105#comment-33844</link>
      <description>great article Loraine! will be really interesting to see what kinds of BI mash-ups take hold and which fall by the wayside.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 11:03:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>Zak</author>
      <guid>http://www.itbusinessedge.com/cm/blogs/lawson/applying-mashups-to-business-intelligence/?cs=37105#comment-33844</guid>
      <dc:date>2009-10-30T11:03:38Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE:&amp;nbsp;Consulting Firm Calls for Unified SOA Standards</title>
      <link>http://www.itbusinessedge.com/cm/blogs/lawson/consulting-firm-calls-for-unified-soa-standards/?cs=36407#comment-33841</link>
      <description>Given that the S in OASIS is for Standards, I am slightly confused by JP's comment. If the OASIS work is not a standard then but a 'product', then I guess that means our CBDI SOA meta model work that was produced via an open process in which many of our</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 23:00:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>Lawrence Wilkes</author>
      <guid>http://www.itbusinessedge.com/cm/blogs/lawson/consulting-firm-calls-for-unified-soa-standards/?cs=36407#comment-33841</guid>
      <dc:date>2009-10-29T23:00:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE:&amp;nbsp;What's Holding Up Semantic Integration?</title>
      <link>http://www.itbusinessedge.com/cm/blogs/lawson/whats-holding-up-semantic-integration/?cs=37002#comment-33793</link>
      <description>Correct - semantics is about getting agreements between humans (i.e., do we mean the same thing when we use the term "customer"). This, together with the issue that easy, mainstream tooling is not yet out there (and less focused on the agreement side),</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 18:00:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>Stijn Christiaens</author>
      <guid>http://www.itbusinessedge.com/cm/blogs/lawson/whats-holding-up-semantic-integration/?cs=37002#comment-33793</guid>
      <dc:date>2009-10-27T18:00:11Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE:&amp;nbsp;What's Holding Up Semantic Integration?</title>
      <link>http://www.itbusinessedge.com/cm/blogs/lawson/whats-holding-up-semantic-integration/?cs=37002#comment-33791</link>
      <description>I released "Enterprise Information Integration: A Pragmatic Approach" in 2005, which focuses heavily on the semantic integration problem domain.&amp;nbsp; Since then the book has sold steadily, but at a low volume.&amp;nbsp; I have taken that to mean that there</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 16:10:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>JP Morgenthal</author>
      <guid>http://www.itbusinessedge.com/cm/blogs/lawson/whats-holding-up-semantic-integration/?cs=37002#comment-33791</guid>
      <dc:date>2009-10-27T16:10:34Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE:&amp;nbsp;What's Holding Up Semantic Integration?</title>
      <link>http://www.itbusinessedge.com/cm/blogs/lawson/whats-holding-up-semantic-integration/?cs=37002#comment-33790</link>
      <description>Loraine-- I think Keller's point is largely a cop-out.&amp;nbsp; Take for instance your typical BI project based on conventional technology; the specification of ETL mappings, dimensional models, aggregate functions, and multi-way join SQL to correctly</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 15:51:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>pedanticweb</author>
      <guid>http://www.itbusinessedge.com/cm/blogs/lawson/whats-holding-up-semantic-integration/?cs=37002#comment-33790</guid>
      <dc:date>2009-10-27T15:51:57Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE:&amp;nbsp;Hard-Learned Lessons About e-Medical Records from Kaiser Permanente</title>
      <link>http://www.itbusinessedge.com/cm/blogs/lawson/hard-learned-lessons-about-e-medical-records-from-kaiser-permanente/?cs=31997#comment-33693</link>
      <description>Electronic Health Sytem have the potential to improve patient's Health care and maintain reports of patient.EMR System provides the best way to handle the Patient Secure.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 10:31:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>Allscripts Online Training</author>
      <guid>http://www.itbusinessedge.com/cm/blogs/lawson/hard-learned-lessons-about-e-medical-records-from-kaiser-permanente/?cs=31997#comment-33693</guid>
      <dc:date>2009-10-21T10:31:07Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE:&amp;nbsp;SOA: Another Reason for an Integration Competency Center</title>
      <link>http://www.itbusinessedge.com/cm/blogs/lawson/soa-another-reason-for-an-integration-competency-center/?cs=36729#comment-33638</link>
      <description>Loraine - We're seeing the level of interest in ICC's growing within our membership. As a result, just this week we launched a free group for ICC enthusiasts and have made all ICC related content on our site accessible to group members. As an added</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 15:14:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>Leanne MacDonald</author>
      <guid>http://www.itbusinessedge.com/cm/blogs/lawson/soa-another-reason-for-an-integration-competency-center/?cs=36729#comment-33638</guid>
      <dc:date>2009-10-16T15:14:09Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE:&amp;nbsp;Can Enterprise Architects Align IT to the Business? Yeah, Right.</title>
      <link>http://www.itbusinessedge.com/cm/blogs/lawson/can-enterprise-architects-align-it-to-the-business-yeah-right/?cs=36310#comment-33603</link>
      <description>Once again, Loraine:&amp;nbsp; interesting topic!&amp;nbsp; This one reminiscent of another  discussion  in your column long ago.  &amp;nbsp; Regarding your consideration about... "how well they'll be able to transcend IT and work with the business - not to mention</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 23:44:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>FrankMillar</author>
      <guid>http://www.itbusinessedge.com/cm/blogs/lawson/can-enterprise-architects-align-it-to-the-business-yeah-right/?cs=36310#comment-33603</guid>
      <dc:date>2009-10-13T23:44:23Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE:&amp;nbsp;Three Unusual Places to Find Enterprise Architects</title>
      <link>http://www.itbusinessedge.com/cm/blogs/lawson/three-unusual-places-to-find-enterprise-architects/?cs=36356#comment-33575</link>
      <description>A good Enterprise Architect is a business process analyst with an IT focus.&amp;nbsp; An IT BPA understands the recursive relationship between IT and business; understands the goals and objectives of the organization, how it functions day-2-day and applies</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 16:51:41 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>Stephanie Quick</author>
      <guid>http://www.itbusinessedge.com/cm/blogs/lawson/three-unusual-places-to-find-enterprise-architects/?cs=36356#comment-33575</guid>
      <dc:date>2009-10-12T16:51:41Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE:&amp;nbsp;Can IT Save SOA and Itself by Learning from Web 2.0?</title>
      <link>http://www.itbusinessedge.com/cm/blogs/lawson/can-it-save-soa-and-itself-by-learning-from-web-20/?cs=36529#comment-33537</link>
      <description>I guess some people will just refuse to accept that SOA is NOT an application architecture.&amp;nbsp; It's part of the Enterprise Architecture and to narrow it's scope to the point where it can be compared to WOA completely undermines the effort to use SOA</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 15:26:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>JP Morgenthal</author>
      <guid>http://www.itbusinessedge.com/cm/blogs/lawson/can-it-save-soa-and-itself-by-learning-from-web-20/?cs=36529#comment-33537</guid>
      <dc:date>2009-10-09T15:26:53Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE:&amp;nbsp;Three Unusual Places to Find Enterprise Architects</title>
      <link>http://www.itbusinessedge.com/cm/blogs/lawson/three-unusual-places-to-find-enterprise-architects/?cs=36356#comment-33529</link>
      <description>I think your question about empirical data existing for any job is a great point. &amp;nbsp; I commented on your rant so I won't duplicate it here, but I have been calling for a focus on business outcomes, influencing decisions across business and IT, and a</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 11:40:41 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>Mike Rollings</author>
      <guid>http://www.itbusinessedge.com/cm/blogs/lawson/three-unusual-places-to-find-enterprise-architects/?cs=36356#comment-33529</guid>
      <dc:date>2009-10-09T11:40:41Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE:&amp;nbsp;Can Enterprise Architects Align IT to the Business? Yeah, Right.</title>
      <link>http://www.itbusinessedge.com/cm/blogs/lawson/can-enterprise-architects-align-it-to-the-business-yeah-right/?cs=36310#comment-33528</link>
      <description>Loraine, I agree.&amp;nbsp; Saying that an enterprise architect will save the day is naive and totally misses the fact that the competencies are the important part and not the title.&amp;nbsp;  &amp;nbsp; In my blog post "Is the business result more valuable than</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 11:31:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>Mike Rollings</author>
      <guid>http://www.itbusinessedge.com/cm/blogs/lawson/can-enterprise-architects-align-it-to-the-business-yeah-right/?cs=36310#comment-33528</guid>
      <dc:date>2009-10-09T11:31:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

