'Boiling the Ocean' an Overwhelming Data Issue

Loraine Lawson

We always like unambiguous responses to our efforts, and reader Matt Stitz came through for us in his comments about a recent IT Business Edge interview with Ron Schumacher, the CTO of Initiate Systems. "What a useless column/article!" wrote Stitz.


He was referring to the question of "which data should [be in] a central hub master, and which data should be a pure reference file. Where do you draw the line between the two and why?" to use his words.


That's exactly the question. Let's address the "why" part. CIOs have stated over and over that the idea of cleaning up all the data in their enterprise is overwhelming. Paul Friedman, CTO and co-founder of customer data integration (CDI) vendor Purisma, argued in another IT Business Edge interview that there are strong business reasons for cleaning up data, but advises a step-wise approach, "Don't try to boil the ocean and say, 'I'm going to unify all my operational systems and get everything flowing and syncing before I get any value.'"


So there you have it. The reason for drawing the line is so you don't have to boil the ocean.


Having said that, there are some highly respected -- and very large -- companies that are committed to total CDI, including PepsiCo. Maybe they read the recent TDWI survey where 85 percent of the responding organizations reported problems resulting from poor master data.

Add Comment      Leave a comment on this blog post
Nov 10, 2006 1:43 AM Matt Stitz Matt Stitz  says:
cvb Reply
Nov 10, 2006 2:09 AM Matt Stitz Matt Stitz  says:
Mike Stevens,I see that you have taken a comment I made about "your" article and published it out of context.  I happen to have thoroughly enjoyed the interview with Ron Schumacher, and found it very insightful.  Your article, however was, in my humble opinion, nothing but fluff, and didn't provide much value.  I am upset that it looks as though I spoke negatively of somebody's interview that I happened to enjoy.  I don't think you had any wrong intentions here, but it is merely an instance of mis-interpretation.  If you can, please clear this up.  Thanks! Reply

Post a comment





(Maximum characters: 1200). You have 1200 characters left.



Subscribe to our Newsletters

Sign up now and get the best business technology insights direct to your inbox.