<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:clearspace="http://www.jivesoftware.com/xmlns/clearspace/rss" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:opensearch="http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearch/1.1/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Ken Hardin</title>
    <link>http://www.itbusinessedge.com/cm/blogs/hardin</link>
    <description>Comment Feed for Ken Hardin</description>
    <pubDate>Sun, 10 Jan 2010 00:01:28 GMT</pubDate>
    <generator>Clearspace 2.5.5 (http://jivesoftware.com/products/clearspace/)</generator>
    <dc:date>2010-01-10T00:01:28Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>RE:&amp;nbsp;The Elusive ROI of Improving Communication</title>
      <link>http://www.itbusinessedge.com/cm/blogs/hardin/the-elusive-roi-of-improving-communication/?cs=24503#comment-35267</link>
      <description>Great article, Ken. I think you are pointing to the value in the 'social' part of the knowledge network. Experts come together, innovation happens. However, the best of technologies (whether 2.0 Enteprise solutions, Web 2.0 online technology, or simply</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 10 Jan 2010 00:01:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>Jeff Wilfong</author>
      <guid>http://www.itbusinessedge.com/cm/blogs/hardin/the-elusive-roi-of-improving-communication/?cs=24503#comment-35267</guid>
      <dc:date>2010-01-10T00:01:28Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE:&amp;nbsp;Oh, Boy: A Grumpy Manager's Observations on Millennials</title>
      <link>http://www.itbusinessedge.com/cm/blogs/hardin/oh-boy-a-grumpy-managers-observations-on-millennials/?cs=35762#comment-33624</link>
      <description>I am a techie by default. Went to Uni a little later than some. Studied communications, writing, film, video, all the visual creative stuff. Thats how I find myself now in QA. I love it. I am good at it. But I agree with your point about focus and</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 16:23:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>Collie</author>
      <guid>http://www.itbusinessedge.com/cm/blogs/hardin/oh-boy-a-grumpy-managers-observations-on-millennials/?cs=35762#comment-33624</guid>
      <dc:date>2009-10-15T16:23:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE:&amp;nbsp;'Better' Practices Often the Best Results of Innovation</title>
      <link>http://www.itbusinessedge.com/cm/blogs/hardin/better-practices-often-the-best-results-of-innovation/?cs=35477#comment-33240</link>
      <description>Yes, I agree.&amp;nbsp; That was basically my point, but you said it better. So, thank you!&amp;nbsp;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 15:19:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>User1711148</author>
      <guid>http://www.itbusinessedge.com/cm/blogs/hardin/better-practices-often-the-best-results-of-innovation/?cs=35477#comment-33240</guid>
      <dc:date>2009-09-21T15:19:34Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE:&amp;nbsp;Google and Twitter -- It's the Ads, Stupid</title>
      <link>http://www.itbusinessedge.com/cm/blogs/hardin/google-and-twitter--its-the-ads-stupid/?cs=31571#comment-33232</link>
      <description>Check out  Top 50 Stupid, Bad, Banned Ads and Commercials</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 20 Sep 2009 23:18:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>Michael Garmahis</author>
      <guid>http://www.itbusinessedge.com/cm/blogs/hardin/google-and-twitter--its-the-ads-stupid/?cs=31571#comment-33232</guid>
      <dc:date>2009-09-20T23:18:36Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE:&amp;nbsp;'Better' Practices Often the Best Results of Innovation</title>
      <link>http://www.itbusinessedge.com/cm/blogs/hardin/better-practices-often-the-best-results-of-innovation/?cs=35477#comment-33222</link>
      <description>Well I sort of agree but I think that within 'Best' Practice there has to be room to innovate or (almost by definition) there is a practice that is better! &amp;nbsp;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 19 Sep 2009 06:06:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>RegMigrant</author>
      <guid>http://www.itbusinessedge.com/cm/blogs/hardin/better-practices-often-the-best-results-of-innovation/?cs=35477#comment-33222</guid>
      <dc:date>2009-09-19T06:06:17Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE:&amp;nbsp;'Better' Practices Often the Best Results of Innovation</title>
      <link>http://www.itbusinessedge.com/cm/blogs/hardin/better-practices-often-the-best-results-of-innovation/?cs=35477#comment-33217</link>
      <description>It sounds like the terms "Best Practices" and "Innovation" need to be better defined.&amp;nbsp; My opinion is that both are important and need to exist. But like anything else, they need to remain in their place.&amp;nbsp; For instance, consider the senario</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 18:32:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>Bryan Moore</author>
      <guid>http://www.itbusinessedge.com/cm/blogs/hardin/better-practices-often-the-best-results-of-innovation/?cs=35477#comment-33217</guid>
      <dc:date>2009-09-18T18:32:45Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE:&amp;nbsp;'Better' Practices Often the Best Results of Innovation</title>
      <link>http://www.itbusinessedge.com/cm/blogs/hardin/better-practices-often-the-best-results-of-innovation/?cs=35477#comment-33216</link>
      <description>Edison famously treated his attempts to get a light bulb working as just discovering ways not to do it right, a positive, healthy attitude to innovation. He also did his work in a lab keeping excellent records etc, best practice for his time and equally</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 17:46:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>RegMigrant</author>
      <guid>http://www.itbusinessedge.com/cm/blogs/hardin/better-practices-often-the-best-results-of-innovation/?cs=35477#comment-33216</guid>
      <dc:date>2009-09-18T17:46:24Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE:&amp;nbsp;'Better' Practices Often the Best Results of Innovation</title>
      <link>http://www.itbusinessedge.com/cm/blogs/hardin/better-practices-often-the-best-results-of-innovation/?cs=35477#comment-33076</link>
      <description>So much becomes semantics. But I think we're in agreement here - Seems like there's three steps:  What you can do - that's where innovation comes in What you should do - that's an analytical step that tries to weed out innovations that are clearly not</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 03:28:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>M Ellard</author>
      <guid>http://www.itbusinessedge.com/cm/blogs/hardin/better-practices-often-the-best-results-of-innovation/?cs=35477#comment-33076</guid>
      <dc:date>2009-09-09T03:28:18Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE:&amp;nbsp;'Better' Practices Often the Best Results of Innovation</title>
      <link>http://www.itbusinessedge.com/cm/blogs/hardin/better-practices-often-the-best-results-of-innovation/?cs=35477#comment-32967</link>
      <description>I believe that the point is not to be receptive to failure, but to change the way how you define what you do. Everybody looks like to be adopting the classic model of production (r&amp;amp;d-product-production-market) when they could be working with</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 16:57:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>Flávio Pimentel</author>
      <guid>http://www.itbusinessedge.com/cm/blogs/hardin/better-practices-often-the-best-results-of-innovation/?cs=35477#comment-32967</guid>
      <dc:date>2009-09-03T16:57:56Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE:&amp;nbsp;'Better' Practices Often the Best Results of Innovation</title>
      <link>http://www.itbusinessedge.com/cm/blogs/hardin/better-practices-often-the-best-results-of-innovation/?cs=35477#comment-32961</link>
      <description>As you say, an interesting but ultimately unresolvable discussion.&amp;nbsp; My two cents - there is one area where innovation and best practices (in the "process" sense you use it here) will always be in conflict: failure.&amp;nbsp; Best practice processes</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 15:02:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>MikeHarris</author>
      <guid>http://www.itbusinessedge.com/cm/blogs/hardin/better-practices-often-the-best-results-of-innovation/?cs=35477#comment-32961</guid>
      <dc:date>2009-09-03T15:02:40Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE:&amp;nbsp;Gmail Outages Bring out the Neo-Luddite in Me</title>
      <link>http://www.itbusinessedge.com/cm/blogs/hardin/gmail-outages-bring-out-the-neo-luddite-in-me/?cs=35437#comment-32919</link>
      <description>Oops.&amp;nbsp; That was supposed to say, it's right up there with oxygen and electricity.&amp;nbsp; Embarrassing when the first comment self-destructs.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 02:21:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>Geörgy Martin</author>
      <guid>http://www.itbusinessedge.com/cm/blogs/hardin/gmail-outages-bring-out-the-neo-luddite-in-me/?cs=35437#comment-32919</guid>
      <dc:date>2009-09-02T02:21:13Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE:&amp;nbsp;Gmail Outages Bring out the Neo-Luddite in Me</title>
      <link>http://www.itbusinessedge.com/cm/blogs/hardin/gmail-outages-bring-out-the-neo-luddite-in-me/?cs=35437#comment-32918</link>
      <description>Yes, I suppose e-mail is right up there with oxygen and e-mail.&amp;nbsp; Now that's addiction.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 02:19:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>Geörgy Martin</author>
      <guid>http://www.itbusinessedge.com/cm/blogs/hardin/gmail-outages-bring-out-the-neo-luddite-in-me/?cs=35437#comment-32918</guid>
      <dc:date>2009-09-02T02:19:59Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE:&amp;nbsp;Google Keeps Me up at Night, Caffeine or No</title>
      <link>http://www.itbusinessedge.com/cm/blogs/hardin/google-keeps-me-up-at-night-caffeine-or-no/?cs=34870#comment-32557</link>
      <description>Thanks, Nate - I'll check it out</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 21:30:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>KenHardin</author>
      <guid>http://www.itbusinessedge.com/cm/blogs/hardin/google-keeps-me-up-at-night-caffeine-or-no/?cs=34870#comment-32557</guid>
      <dc:date>2009-08-12T21:30:57Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE:&amp;nbsp;Google Keeps Me up at Night, Caffeine or No</title>
      <link>http://www.itbusinessedge.com/cm/blogs/hardin/google-keeps-me-up-at-night-caffeine-or-no/?cs=34870#comment-32546</link>
      <description>comparegoogle.com is pretty cool. It shows the difference in search results for the two algorithms. Just put in some keywords and see what changed. Could be helpful for SEO engineers.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 23:46:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>Nate@Doubleshot</author>
      <guid>http://www.itbusinessedge.com/cm/blogs/hardin/google-keeps-me-up-at-night-caffeine-or-no/?cs=34870#comment-32546</guid>
      <dc:date>2009-08-11T23:46:04Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE:&amp;nbsp;Social Media Remains Frustratingly 'Soft'</title>
      <link>http://www.itbusinessedge.com/cm/blogs/hardin/social-media-remains-frustratingly-soft/?cs=32566#comment-32281</link>
      <description>Ken I understand where you are coming from but I think that you are perhaps not fully informed.&amp;nbsp; There is no doubt that it is a "young media" especially from a business perspective, and also that you need a well thought out process and approach for</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 06:10:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>Walter Adamson</author>
      <guid>http://www.itbusinessedge.com/cm/blogs/hardin/social-media-remains-frustratingly-soft/?cs=32566#comment-32281</guid>
      <dc:date>2009-07-22T06:10:13Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE:&amp;nbsp;New "Virtual Machine" for Multi-Core Apps</title>
      <link>http://www.itbusinessedge.com/cm/blogs/hardin/new-virtual-machine-for-multi-core-apps/?cs=24110#comment-31962</link>
      <description>Great blogging! write more about "virtual machine". Thank you!</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 00:26:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>yajivtech</author>
      <guid>http://www.itbusinessedge.com/cm/blogs/hardin/new-virtual-machine-for-multi-core-apps/?cs=24110#comment-31962</guid>
      <dc:date>2009-06-26T00:26:05Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE:&amp;nbsp;Yep, Folks Are in No Rush for New OS</title>
      <link>http://www.itbusinessedge.com/cm/blogs/hardin/yep-folks-are-in-no-rush-for-new-os/?cs=32725#comment-31565</link>
      <description>Ken,  &amp;nbsp; First (and I know you know this but for the benefit of your readers), when we get to: "post something to the effect of, “A leading industry expert has just announced that she fully endorses an idea that I wrote about a month ago.”" it's</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 17:54:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>DennisByron</author>
      <guid>http://www.itbusinessedge.com/cm/blogs/hardin/yep-folks-are-in-no-rush-for-new-os/?cs=32725#comment-31565</guid>
      <dc:date>2009-05-22T17:54:22Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE:&amp;nbsp;Yep, Folks Are in No Rush for New OS</title>
      <link>http://www.itbusinessedge.com/cm/blogs/hardin/yep-folks-are-in-no-rush-for-new-os/?cs=32725#comment-31544</link>
      <description>This reminds me of a story I heard when I was a kid -- A potter, after hearing so many complaints from his customers, prays to God to grant him a boon whereby all pots made by him are unbreakable. God, after failing to convince the potter about the</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 05:22:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>Sateesh</author>
      <guid>http://www.itbusinessedge.com/cm/blogs/hardin/yep-folks-are-in-no-rush-for-new-os/?cs=32725#comment-31544</guid>
      <dc:date>2009-05-22T05:22:47Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE:&amp;nbsp;Yep, Folks Are in No Rush for New OS</title>
      <link>http://www.itbusinessedge.com/cm/blogs/hardin/yep-folks-are-in-no-rush-for-new-os/?cs=32725#comment-31538</link>
      <description>Brilliant. I will let go of XP only when they pry it from my cold, dead fingers...</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 16:29:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>FMJohnson</author>
      <guid>http://www.itbusinessedge.com/cm/blogs/hardin/yep-folks-are-in-no-rush-for-new-os/?cs=32725#comment-31538</guid>
      <dc:date>2009-05-21T16:29:10Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE:&amp;nbsp;Social Media Remains Frustratingly 'Soft'</title>
      <link>http://www.itbusinessedge.com/cm/blogs/hardin/social-media-remains-frustratingly-soft/?cs=32566#comment-31467</link>
      <description>Social Media isn't just about products and consumers, its about connecting with a greater world you would otherwise not have the opportunity to interact with.&amp;nbsp; Something you can't put a benchmark or $$ sign on.&amp;nbsp; Its priceless...&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 21:31:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>Melissa</author>
      <guid>http://www.itbusinessedge.com/cm/blogs/hardin/social-media-remains-frustratingly-soft/?cs=32566#comment-31467</guid>
      <dc:date>2009-05-14T21:31:37Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

