Apple Tablet Dance: Rise of a More Powerful Apple or a New Decline?

Rob Enderle

Next week begins the post PC era, what could be the one of the most important events in technology since the launch of the Apple II. Apple launched a revolution and then watched other companies take that revolution away. This time, with an older and wiser Steve Jobs, the company will get a second chance to both change the future and be the primary beneficiary of that change. But instead of facing a young Microsoft this time, it is facing a young and successful Google.

 

The outcome of this battle will be no surer than the outcome of the last one in the early '80s. Let's explore this a bit as we ramp to what might turn out to be the launch that defined this decade much like the iPod helped define the last one.

 

The Promise of the Tablet

The market is in the hunt -- and has been since the inception of the thin client -- for something to replace the PC. Thin clients didn't make it, PDAs didn't make it, and while smartphones have made a significant amount of progress, they didn't make it either.

 

In addition, ebooks have been unable to move in education because they fall short of the multimedia and color requirements, and other mobile platforms such as gaming have fallen short of the market potential of the PC.

 

The Apple tablet, regardless of the name, holds the promise to correct all this. Details continue to leak out at an impressive rate, building a frenzy only slightly more twisted then the discussion on NASA airbrushing out a secret alien moon base. The iSlate -- or whatever is is to be called -- is large enough to provide a viable replacement for a small laptop. It is -- or will be -- capable of embracing what ebooks do, plus add color and multimedia, and since it leverages the iPhone, it already has a significant amount of gaming capability.

 

Wrapped with an improved new interface with entertainment such as movies and TV, on paper it looks like the perfect replacement for a lot of expensive devices in one slim package. With Apple's unique ability to persuade buyers to try something new, this could be one of those rare products that catapults a company to even greater heights, much like the iPod and iPhone did.

 

The Risk

However, this product does potentially cannibalize the Mac, iPod and iPhone. And someone else such as Google could get it right first, scale to multiple hardware suppliers and vastly more application builders, and take this emerging market away from Apple. This effectively is what Microsoft did to Apple in the '80s.

 

The problem is that the screen and low-cost data plan Apple needs to make this offering ideal are still some time out. The screens (like Qualcom MIrasol) are about six months out and the low-cost wireless services are about three years away. In addition, the content licenses that Apple needs for movies, TV, publications and books are, depending on type, six months or more out as well.

 

This suggests that the ideal product, even from Apple, might be the second- or third-generation offering, which allows time for the rapid development of strong competitors who partner better than Apple does.

 

Because so much of the success of this product will depend on back-end services and content access, Apple's historic inability to partner well might be its critical weakness.

 

Could Microsoft Help?

With Apple and Microsoft already in rumored talks to convert theiPhone from Google Search to Bing, there is a potential for the two companies to partner so that Apple could use Microsoft's ecosystem as a stronger hedge against Google dominance. However the amount of bad blood between the two companies and Apple's unwillingness to license technology broadly stands in the way of a more substantive partnership.

 

Wrapping Up: Change Is Coming

This launch will formally begin a process that will dramatically change the way we communicate, enjoy content ranging from text to video, and access the Web while mobile. This could bring change as big as that Apple initially created when it launched the first real personal computer. Apple has even more potential to transform the world this time, but could be limited by the same factors as before. This time, with a more experienced CEO, Apple doesn't face Microsoft, but an even faster-growing Google. Regardless of the outcome, this launch will be an event for the history books.



Add Comment      Leave a comment on this blog post

Jan 22, 2010 1:38 AM Adam Banks Adam Banks  says:

"someone else such as Google could get it right first" - I don't think so, because to make tablet computing mainstream it needs a touchstone. Portable digital music players crossed over when iPod launched because you could say "iPod" and people knew what you meant, and you could draw a cartoon of an iPod and it would stand for music players. Only Apple can do this. A Slatedroid might create buzz in the geekosphere but its mindshare would be fatally limited. Needs to be a single concrete product with Appleness."the screen and low-cost data plan Apple needs to make this offering ideal are still some time out" - maybe, but iPhone 1 didn't even have 3G, or copy and paste. It can be technically lame as long as it looks and feels about right.What seriously worries me about iSlate is the data contract. I put off getting iPhone for months because I didn't want a new contract, even though I can see why a cellphone needs a contract. I don't see why a slate needs a contract. Probably wouldn't even use it for mobile web access. Load up content via WiFi and carry it around, la iPod touch - great. Pay another GBP35 ($50, min iPhone contract here) a month for the privilege? Plus whatever content subscriptions may cost? No way. Can they make an off-contract option affordable? That's the killer question for me.

@adambanksdotcom

Reply
Jan 22, 2010 1:53 AM Rob Enderle Rob Enderle  says: in response to Adam Banks

Yes but recall this is what happened with the Mac, Microsoft and its partners got the ideal right first and dominated the market.  Apple is more successful then they were and very profitable but still far from dominant in that space.   With the iPhone they don't even lead that segment (except in profit) and Smartphones are still a tiny part of the available market.  If the market turns and becomes what it could be Apple is still self limiting like they were before.   Agree that, right now, the wireless charge is the biggest problem for Apple and this class of device. 

Reply
Jan 22, 2010 2:11 AM Adam Banks Adam Banks  says: in response to Rob Enderle

Heh, you and I should remember 1984 seems a long time ago to some people.


The past is a different country. PC didn't beat Mac in consumer space: that war was for corporate bucks. Now? Shiniest wins. Re iPhone, meaningless to consider all phones as one market; in smartphones, I've never heard a real person talk about anything but Apple or BlackBerry, and remember Apple was very, very late. This time it's early. I can't call success/failure of iSlate but I will say: if Apple's doesn't make it, nobody's will. Not this time round.

@adambanksdotcom

Reply
Jan 22, 2010 10:11 AM a. asdf a. asdf  says:

There is so much anticipation built up for the Apple tablet that it can't help but disappoint. Unless the thing is able to teleport its' owner through space and time, people are going to be underwhelmed. All this reminds me of the time the Segway came out.

"Since last January it has also been the tech world's most-speculated-about secret. That was when a book proposal about Ginger, a.k.a. "IT," got leaked to the website Inside.com. Kamen had been working on Ginger for more than a decade, and although the author (with whom the inventor is no longer collaborating) never revealed what Ginger was, his precis included over-the-top assessments from some of Silicon Valley's mightiest kingpins. As big a deal as the PC, said Steve Jobs; maybe bigger than the Internet, said John Doerr, the venture capitalist behind Netscape, Amazon.com and now Ginger. "

http://www.time.com/time/business/article/0,8599,186660,00.html

Reply
Jan 24, 2010 2:43 AM Rob Enderle Rob Enderle  says: in response to a. asdf

Segway...  Yes it showcases the danger of too much hype but you have to admit the Segway as a transportation device would have had trouble displacing horses as well.  This does have more potential to be a game changer.  Agree with the previous post as well (though outside of the US NOKIA is actually a power in the Smartphone segment) that if Apple can't do this it is unlikely anyone can.  They are unmatched in bringing out stuff that can transform an industry but they did miss with AppleTV and that suggests some caution this time as many of the same problems with AppleTV will exist here. 

Reply

Post a comment

 

 

 

 


(Maximum characters: 1200). You have 1200 characters left.

 

 

Subscribe to our Newsletters

Sign up now and get the best business technology insights direct to your inbox.