Quit Yer Whining: Microsoft Could Have Bought DoubleClick, but Didn't

Kachina Shaw

Losing is not fun. Neither are sore losers. Looks like a whole lot of mirthless days ahead for Microsoft, now that it has let DoubleClick slip through its fingers and right into the waiting hands of archrival Google. I wonder who had the final say on Microsoft not going above $2 billion for DoubleClick, as has been reported, and whether they've gotten any sleep over the weekend.

Before the sale was announced Friday, these benefits were predicted for Microsoft and its ailing online strategy if it acquired the company, as compiled by ZDNet's Larry Dignan:

  • A more powerful and competitive AdCenter
  • A pretty piece of the online ad market
  • Much-needed executive/management expertise in online advertising

Now that Google has outbid Microsoft, Yahoo and others and is acquiring DoubleClick for $3.1 billion, Microsoft gets ... a chance to complain that the deal will produce an anti-competitive climate? I think it did that all by itself.


Of these three front-running potential buyers, which appeared to need it most?


Not Yahoo, which has a healthy display ad revenue stream. Not Google, the master of online strategy. Dominate search advertising? Check. Dominate display advertising? Pretty soon. (And it won't even have to develop its own display advertising platform or the ad marketplace that rumors said was to compete directly with DoubleClick.)


Now, Microsoft is not the only one crying -- Yahoo and others are joining in on the call for regulators to butt in -- but it's crying the loudest.


That's not to say that Microsoft can't now turn around and acquire a competitor of DoubleClick, or better yet a whole passel of them, but why bother? It'd be like tripping on the broken sidewalk, looking back at the offending spot and saying, "I meant to do that." It accomplishes nothing after the fact.


And you look like an even bigger idiot.


Maybe now it'll have to go back to its plan to buy Yahoo, and I expect that extra $1.1 billion will seem like pocket change at that point.

Add Comment      Leave a comment on this blog post
Apr 16, 2007 6:06 AM plate plate  says:
I totally agree - it's one thing to not pay enough but then go back and say it's not worth this amount after the deal goes through. MSFT would have gone on the offensive with this deal by blocking out google for opportunities for display. It also would have boosted their online strategy. It could have afforded it. Bottom line - the 1.1 billion is not much considering the opportunities it could have brought in - not to mention a great deffensive block to Google or YahooWhen are the executives at MSFT going to wake up and get serious about advertising? Reply

Post a comment





(Maximum characters: 1200). You have 1200 characters left.




Subscribe to our Newsletters

Sign up now and get the best business technology insights direct to your inbox.