<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:clearspace="http://www.jivesoftware.com/xmlns/clearspace/rss" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:opensearch="http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearch/1.1/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Arthur Cole</title>
    <link>http://www.itbusinessedge.com/cm/blogs/cole</link>
    <description>Comment Feed for Arthur Cole</description>
    <pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 13:03:37 GMT</pubDate>
    <generator>Clearspace 2.5.5 (http://jivesoftware.com/products/clearspace/)</generator>
    <dc:date>2009-11-07T13:03:37Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>RE:&amp;nbsp;Blurring the Line Between Public and Private Clouds</title>
      <link>http://www.itbusinessedge.com/cm/blogs/cole/blurring-the-line-between-public-and-private-clouds/?cs=37167#comment-33980</link>
      <description>Great post Arthur. I have quoted you on my blog. &amp;nbsp; http://wp.me/pmAb3-o &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 13:03:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>Christian</author>
      <guid>http://www.itbusinessedge.com/cm/blogs/cole/blurring-the-line-between-public-and-private-clouds/?cs=37167#comment-33980</guid>
      <dc:date>2009-11-07T13:03:37Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE:&amp;nbsp;Blurring the Line Between Public and Private Clouds</title>
      <link>http://www.itbusinessedge.com/cm/blogs/cole/blurring-the-line-between-public-and-private-clouds/?cs=37167#comment-33971</link>
      <description>the previous post makes a good point.&amp;nbsp; What good is a cloud where you own the whole platform in your datacenter?&amp;nbsp;  &amp;nbsp; A nice application of the "internal" private cloud is when you have a shared service model that charges business units</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 22:29:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>user1271168</author>
      <guid>http://www.itbusinessedge.com/cm/blogs/cole/blurring-the-line-between-public-and-private-clouds/?cs=37167#comment-33971</guid>
      <dc:date>2009-11-06T22:29:23Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE:&amp;nbsp;The Rise of Commodity Data Centers?</title>
      <link>http://www.itbusinessedge.com/cm/blogs/cole/the-rise-of-commodity-data-centers/?cs=37207#comment-33967</link>
      <description>If a new data center appeared on your doorstep today, perfectly configured to your needs, tomorrow its already a bit off and by 3 years somewhat off unless you adapt to changing application demands and vendor technology capabilities. &amp;nbsp; Greenfields</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 19:06:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>User1748607</author>
      <guid>http://www.itbusinessedge.com/cm/blogs/cole/the-rise-of-commodity-data-centers/?cs=37207#comment-33967</guid>
      <dc:date>2009-11-06T19:06:09Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE:&amp;nbsp;Blurring the Line Between Public and Private Clouds</title>
      <link>http://www.itbusinessedge.com/cm/blogs/cole/blurring-the-line-between-public-and-private-clouds/?cs=37167#comment-33964</link>
      <description>Nice post indeed. I'd be interested to hear your views on organizations who are adopting products like Eucalyptus to deploy "internal" clouds (if such a term can really exist). I think there is an element of confusion around the term Private Cloud and</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 16:32:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>user1421600</author>
      <guid>http://www.itbusinessedge.com/cm/blogs/cole/blurring-the-line-between-public-and-private-clouds/?cs=37167#comment-33964</guid>
      <dc:date>2009-11-06T16:32:57Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE:&amp;nbsp;Will Google Kill the Infrastructure Star?</title>
      <link>http://www.itbusinessedge.com/cm/blogs/cole/will-google-kill-the-infrastructure-star/?cs=36956#comment-33875</link>
      <description>Google needs to partner with a formidable challenger to gain application market share- There are more than a few hardware providers who have not been happy about hosting Microsoft. Lenovo, Sony, and many asian hardware manufacturers could easily be</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 22:24:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>John Smith</author>
      <guid>http://www.itbusinessedge.com/cm/blogs/cole/will-google-kill-the-infrastructure-star/?cs=36956#comment-33875</guid>
      <dc:date>2009-11-02T22:24:36Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE:&amp;nbsp;Blurring the Line Between Public and Private Clouds</title>
      <link>http://www.itbusinessedge.com/cm/blogs/cole/blurring-the-line-between-public-and-private-clouds/?cs=37167#comment-33872</link>
      <description>Nice post Arthur. Another important player with hosted private cloud services is SoftLayer. They even offer bare metal private cloud services. &amp;nbsp; Paul</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 20:16:41 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>Paul Burns</author>
      <guid>http://www.itbusinessedge.com/cm/blogs/cole/blurring-the-line-between-public-and-private-clouds/?cs=37167#comment-33872</guid>
      <dc:date>2009-11-02T20:16:41Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE:&amp;nbsp;To Virtualize the Desktop or Not</title>
      <link>http://www.itbusinessedge.com/cm/blogs/cole/to-virtualize-the-desktop-or-not/?cs=12325#comment-33734</link>
      <description>Virtual desktops must have an experience that’s close to what users get today with their existing PCs. Without which companies would see productivity lost as a result of users not being able to accomplish tasks on VDIs. Citrix with its HDX technology</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 20:58:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>Desktop Virtualization</author>
      <guid>http://www.itbusinessedge.com/cm/blogs/cole/to-virtualize-the-desktop-or-not/?cs=12325#comment-33734</guid>
      <dc:date>2009-10-22T20:58:43Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE:&amp;nbsp;VDI over the WAN</title>
      <link>http://www.itbusinessedge.com/cm/blogs/cole/vdi-over-the-wan/?cs=36527#comment-33733</link>
      <description>Companies considering desktop virtualization today are doing so to escape from the old tired way of managing applications and desktops in the enterprise.  Desktop virtualization  allows companies to be&amp;nbsp; nimble and respond quickly to changes in</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 20:24:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>Desktop Virtualization</author>
      <guid>http://www.itbusinessedge.com/cm/blogs/cole/vdi-over-the-wan/?cs=36527#comment-33733</guid>
      <dc:date>2009-10-22T20:24:31Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE:&amp;nbsp;Managing the Cloud Infrastructure</title>
      <link>http://www.itbusinessedge.com/cm/blogs/cole/managing-the-cloud-infrastructure/?cs=36898#comment-33731</link>
      <description>check out OpSourceCloud.net use promo dmc01 for a 20% discount on the first month...give it a try</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 19:10:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>techmac87</author>
      <guid>http://www.itbusinessedge.com/cm/blogs/cole/managing-the-cloud-infrastructure/?cs=36898#comment-33731</guid>
      <dc:date>2009-10-22T19:10:13Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE:&amp;nbsp;Optimizing the WAN for a Better Cloud</title>
      <link>http://www.itbusinessedge.com/cm/blogs/cole/optimizing-the-wan-for-a-better-cloud/?cs=32631#comment-33607</link>
      <description>Interesting article. We're struggling to capture a vendor who is focusing in this area specifically. Our VPN platform from NeoAccel talks about, optimization of TCP traffic and end to end security and the fact that as everyone accesses the Cloud from</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 13:49:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>Scott Dobson</author>
      <guid>http://www.itbusinessedge.com/cm/blogs/cole/optimizing-the-wan-for-a-better-cloud/?cs=32631#comment-33607</guid>
      <dc:date>2009-10-14T13:49:31Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE:&amp;nbsp;IT Poised for a Comeback?</title>
      <link>http://www.itbusinessedge.com/cm/blogs/cole/it-poised-for-a-comeback/?cs=36566#comment-33604</link>
      <description>Virtualisation, cloud computing has become the buzz word for the industry and they rely on Servers for storage. Necessary move.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 07:53:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>Ashley</author>
      <guid>http://www.itbusinessedge.com/cm/blogs/cole/it-poised-for-a-comeback/?cs=36566#comment-33604</guid>
      <dc:date>2009-10-14T07:53:06Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE:&amp;nbsp;VDI over the WAN</title>
      <link>http://www.itbusinessedge.com/cm/blogs/cole/vdi-over-the-wan/?cs=36527#comment-33602</link>
      <description>Have you considered Citrix Branch Repeater? Branch Repeater, a branch optimization solution,&amp;nbsp; provides enhancements to the HDX module maintaining the same high-definition user experience even in the case of deteoriating network conditions (high</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 23:37:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>Satya Vardharajan</author>
      <guid>http://www.itbusinessedge.com/cm/blogs/cole/vdi-over-the-wan/?cs=36527#comment-33602</guid>
      <dc:date>2009-10-13T23:37:21Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE:&amp;nbsp;VDI over the WAN</title>
      <link>http://www.itbusinessedge.com/cm/blogs/cole/vdi-over-the-wan/?cs=36527#comment-33579</link>
      <description>eh...10GbE?&amp;nbsp; Are you delivering full motion HD video?&amp;nbsp; I personally think this is crazy for most use cases.&amp;nbsp; Seriously, measure the amount of bandwidth required to do your job done...that is after all the reason the company provides you a</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 21:39:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>Rodd Ahrenstorff</author>
      <guid>http://www.itbusinessedge.com/cm/blogs/cole/vdi-over-the-wan/?cs=36527#comment-33579</guid>
      <dc:date>2009-10-12T21:39:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE:&amp;nbsp;VDI over the WAN</title>
      <link>http://www.itbusinessedge.com/cm/blogs/cole/vdi-over-the-wan/?cs=36527#comment-33535</link>
      <description>There are various organizations looking at managed services, like Akamai, that allow the internet to be a high-performance and highly available platform for the delivery of desktop &amp;amp; application virtualization environments as opposed to WAN or</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 14:32:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>Alx Frances</author>
      <guid>http://www.itbusinessedge.com/cm/blogs/cole/vdi-over-the-wan/?cs=36527#comment-33535</guid>
      <dc:date>2009-10-09T14:32:34Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE:&amp;nbsp;Multicore Software Development Moving Slowly</title>
      <link>http://www.itbusinessedge.com/cm/blogs/cole/multicore-software-development-moving-slowly/?cs=12108#comment-33427</link>
      <description>Nice top to have it in different one which i come in this blog thanks to article i got lot ideas on this blog i would like to share about The custom software development companies develop their products for a single customer keeping in mind the specific</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2009 07:22:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>software development services</author>
      <guid>http://www.itbusinessedge.com/cm/blogs/cole/multicore-software-development-moving-slowly/?cs=12108#comment-33427</guid>
      <dc:date>2009-10-03T07:22:14Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE:&amp;nbsp;On the Road to Full Virtualization</title>
      <link>http://www.itbusinessedge.com/cm/blogs/cole/on-the-road-to-full-virtualization/?cs=36233#comment-33395</link>
      <description>The single largest factor we need to consider is virtual sprawl, the saving we could achieve will vanish. I agree that in order to take full advantage virtualization needs to move to the cloud. Five years into the future the face of desktop computing</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 02:49:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>Wolfgang</author>
      <guid>http://www.itbusinessedge.com/cm/blogs/cole/on-the-road-to-full-virtualization/?cs=36233#comment-33395</guid>
      <dc:date>2009-10-01T02:49:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE:&amp;nbsp;SSDs and the Reliability Factor</title>
      <link>http://www.itbusinessedge.com/cm/blogs/cole/ssds-and-the-reliability-factor/?cs=36187#comment-33352</link>
      <description>I think you mean 60 and 120  GB  instead of "adding Samsung 60 and 120 TB devices to the ProLiant G6 and G5 machines."  &amp;nbsp; Excellent info, as usual. I added you to my blogroll this weekend.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 21:56:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>Joe Gleinser</author>
      <guid>http://www.itbusinessedge.com/cm/blogs/cole/ssds-and-the-reliability-factor/?cs=36187#comment-33352</guid>
      <dc:date>2009-09-28T21:56:10Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE:&amp;nbsp;Is It Time for Optical Storage?</title>
      <link>http://www.itbusinessedge.com/cm/blogs/cole/is-it-time-for-optical-storage/?cs=11974#comment-33330</link>
      <description>The issue is to migrate every 4-5 years (Tape environments), or mitigate that risk by migrating to optical now and never have to again. Tape is great for small environments looking for quick nifty backups of non archival grade data. Which means</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 26 Sep 2009 23:56:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>Alani Kuye</author>
      <guid>http://www.itbusinessedge.com/cm/blogs/cole/is-it-time-for-optical-storage/?cs=11974#comment-33330</guid>
      <dc:date>2009-09-26T23:56:24Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE:&amp;nbsp;InfiniBand and the Cloud</title>
      <link>http://www.itbusinessedge.com/cm/blogs/cole/infiniband-and-the-cloud/?cs=35925#comment-33304</link>
      <description>Now that we can move OS workloads which talk to each other closer together, there is less of a need the the dinosaur ethernet design.&amp;nbsp; on top of performance, this is why infiniband should win this race.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 11:36:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>Jacob</author>
      <guid>http://www.itbusinessedge.com/cm/blogs/cole/infiniband-and-the-cloud/?cs=35925#comment-33304</guid>
      <dc:date>2009-09-25T11:36:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE:&amp;nbsp;Big or Small? The Future of Server Architectures</title>
      <link>http://www.itbusinessedge.com/cm/blogs/cole/big-or-small-the-future-of-server-architectures/?cs=36058#comment-33300</link>
      <description>I feel Small Servers are going to grow in near future. Small servers provide best solution for small business and are more cheaper than mainframe servers. &amp;nbsp; Increasing access to broadband and other high speed and cost Internet solutions will enable</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 05:02:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>Saleem Awan</author>
      <guid>http://www.itbusinessedge.com/cm/blogs/cole/big-or-small-the-future-of-server-architectures/?cs=36058#comment-33300</guid>
      <dc:date>2009-09-25T05:02:37Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

