There is a proposal floating among enterprise software venture capitalist (VC) types on Wall St. and the Silicon Valley. I'm asking if it has any impact on the working IT man and woman on Main St. (and High St., etc.). It looks like some kind of President-Obama-inspired Cumbuya enterprise software development proposal, suggesting that the large enterprise software developers, VCs and entrepreneurs all work together instead of at cross purposes.
Of course, like Obamanomics in the auto industry, it leaves out the user. (At least so far, the VC-inspried enterprise software development proposal also leaves out the government, but see my recent post on market share to see how Uncle Sam is going to start limiting your enterprise software choices.)
I'll save you the financial aspects of the proposal but its genesis is that VC investment in enterprise software has dried up since 1999/2000 and therefore enterprise software innovation has ground to a halt.
Let's forget the absurdity in the proposal of using the height of dot-com-era excess as something the investment community should emulate. Let's forget the absurdity in the proposal of using PeopleSoft, Hyperion and Siebel as examples of companies whose innovation was stifled. Let's forget the absurdity in the proposal that a "gauntlet of large companies" stifles enterprise software innovation when three of these four large enterprise software companies (Microsoft, Oracle and SAP) just came through the same gauntlet. And let's forget that there really are no really new innovations to be had but simply constant improvement on past implementations (e.g., cloud computing is timesharing done right).
The questions to you -- the enterprise software user -- are:
In other words, what was innovative about the naught (or aught, if you are not a purist) decade of the 21st century when it comes to enterprise software? Let's make a list and see how it stacks up against the 20th century's seventies, eighties and nineties.