Uniloc, Microsoft Go to Trial Again on Patent Infringement Damages

Lora Bentley

In 2003, Uniloc sued Microsoft for patent infringement, alleging the "product activation system" in Microsoft Office and Windows products infringed its technology, which prevents users from illegally installing software on more than one computer. In 2009, a jury in the U.S. District Court for the District of Rhode Island awarded Uniloc $388 million in damages, but the judge vacated the award and directed the verdict in Microsoft's favor.

 

When Uniloc appealed, arguing the trial judge was biased in favor of Microsoft, I didn't think we'd hear much about the case again. But I'm not ashamed to admit I was wrong. Tuesday, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit reinstated the jury verdict after finding substantial evidence to support the determination that infringement did occur. However, the court also ordered a new trial on the issue of damages. According to an Associated Press piece published in The Washington Post, the original award was, in the court's opinion, "fundamentally tainted."

 

Microsoft VP and Deputy General Counsel David Howard said the new trial should "signal an end of unreasonable and outsized damages awards." But Uniloc's attorney, Paul Hayes, said he is also looking forward to the new trial because a new jury could award an equal or even larger amount.



Add Comment      Leave a comment on this blog post
Jan 5, 2011 8:47 AM mike mike  says:

Microsoft is dumb, at the first sign of a legal issue they should have acquired Uniloc and just bought them out for a couple of million and therefore not have to worry about patent infringement and a judgement several years later for over $100 million, typical BS coming from a large corp legal department and trying to fight the little guy, thinking they will not fight back or last the entire lawsuit, fire them all!

Reply
Jan 7, 2011 2:50 AM Don Dave Don Dave  says:

I think the bigger question is what parts of Microsoft's patents are invalid, and how could this effect other lawsuits? Microsoft knew it could step in some poop with these lawsuits-if their patents are declared invalid due to prior art, then Microsoft would be violating others IP rights

Reply

Post a comment

 

 

 

 


(Maximum characters: 1200). You have 1200 characters left.

 

null
null

 

Subscribe to our Newsletters

Sign up now and get the best business technology insights direct to your inbox.