Teaching IT and Legal to Understand Each Other

Lora Bentley

Whether they're getting ready for the Securities and Exchange Commission's XBRL filing requirement or trying to figure out what their document management and retrieval system should do to best comply with e-discovery requirements, IT and legal can no longer do their jobs effectively without each other.

 

Findings from the latest Kroll Ontrack report on trends in management of electronically stored information bear this out. For instance, 35 percent of survey respondents were giving primary responsibility for ESI (electronically stored information) policy development and enforcement to IT in 2008, up from only 18 percent in 2007.

 

"Responsibility for ESI strategy creation and enforcement must leverage the legal and technical expertise across the entire company-CEO, board, legal, IT, HR, finance and compliance," the report says. "An ongoing marriage between IT and the legal team-blessed by sponsorship from the board-is essential to ensure that the plans put in place are adequate, all encompassing and feasible."

 

But most of the time, IT and legal don't speak the same language. IT operates with charts, diagrams and technical jargon, while those in the law department are often best known as masters of "legalese." Moreover, notes Kroll Ontrack Director of Legal Technologies Michele Lange, the two don't often have similar interests. So how does one go about getting IT and legal around the same table and on the same page when it comes to ESI? Lange says her company, which provides ESI consulting computer forensics and other legal technology services, takes a three-pronged approach:

Helping IT understand what keeps legal up at night is key number one. Legal often says, "IT doesn't understand that this is the life of the company on the line here." The second is to help legal understand some of the technical complexities...We'll work with IT to pull a data map so that legal can understand what the architecture looks like from an IT perspective. The third is what we call a "tabletop drill" or hypothetical that we pose and then ask both groups to respond. It helps both groups to identify the gaps in communication.

There's no one answer that works for every company. Lange says the consulting work is customized. However, the company also offers two-day intensives on e-discovery to provide IT staffers with more depth of knowledge on the issues. Kroll Ontrack's is just one approach, but it's an approach that works.



Add Comment      Leave a comment on this blog post
Jan 29, 2009 1:06 AM James Taylor James Taylor  says:

The other area legal and IT need to work together is when systems implement regulations and must be shown to be compliant. Too many IT departments still write code that the legal team can't read when they are building these systems.

Legal and IT need to work together when systems implement decisions that must be compliant. To do so the IT department must adopt new technologies like business rules and new approaches like decision management.

JT

James Taylor

Author of Smart (Enough) Systems

Reply

Post a comment

 

 

 

 


(Maximum characters: 1200). You have 1200 characters left.

 

null
null

 

Subscribe to our Newsletters

Sign up now and get the best business technology insights direct to your inbox.