From regulatory compliance to corporate governance structure, everyone is involved
Szulik is partially right! Linux Servers definitely have a great chance of domination, but then RedHat is not the only, there is Novell and Mandriva in the run. Who knows the other two will encroach RedHat's territory sooner or later.....
Topic: Linux Distributions
Various releases of Linux tailored for mobile, desktop and server implementations
Blog: Too Early to Gauge Smartphone Market Growth
Article: Retailers Put Linux on Their Holiday Wish List
White Paper: Making the Move: When, What, and How to Migrate from UNIX to Linux
Related Topics
Enterprise Servers, Red Hat, Technology Markets
Aster Data nCluster: A New Architecture for Data AnalyticsRead this white paper to learn about a forward-looking new design for analytic data requirements, with a focus on scalability, availability, manageability, and rapid innovation.
Success Story: Grant Thornton LLPGrant Thornton needed to reduce computer loss rates and streamline IT asset management across 49 offices. Find out how they did it.

Network management tools and tips to increase network speed and efficiency, regardless of office location.

Applications that mid-sized businesses can use to improve operational efficiency, accelerate growth, and maintain profitability.

The virtual, remote, and mobile technologies that allow your company's workforce to work anywhere and at any time.

Business solutions software that reduce costs, improve operational performance, decrease risk, and strengthen business management processes.
Strategic IT Planning & Governance Best Practices GuideUse this guide — along with the more than 60 templates included — to ensure the overall success of your entire IT department.
All About Reducing Your IT CostsLooking to cut costs? Use this research-driven Excel tool to pinpoint which IT cost reduction measures best fit your needs.
With Red Hat, Novell, and Sun all gunning for 51% of the market each, there won't be much left for Microsoft.
Numbers can be deceiving. Very often, a single Linux machine or UNIX machine can do the work of 6-8 Windows machines. With SMP, NUMA, LPARs, Virtualization, and library optimization and sharing, a PPC based Linux or AIX system can pump a few gigabytes/second, while a similarly configured Windows pipeline might only do a few hundred megabytes per second due to latency, memory contention, garbage collection, and context switching overhead.
Microsoft is often used as a peripiheral or gateway server, connecting one .NET server in one company to another .NET server in another company. In many cases, these "Modem" servers are then integrated to the "Big Iron" which might be a single 64 core Linux or AIX server, or a 128 blade grid of Linux servers.
I am often fascinated when someone tries to count a blade cabinet or 64 core server as 1 unit, and also count a 1U single chip dual-drive rack mount server as 1 unit and attempt to claim that Microsoft has the "Lead".
The more amusing thing is when Microsoft is attempting to claim leadership by dollar volume. In effect, they are demonstrating, at a macro level, that Linux has far better TCO than Windows. If I need twice as many Windows servers, and Microsoft getting 4 times the revenue per box, compared to Linux, doesn't this mean that I can get 8 times the performance for the same amount of money, by using Linux?