Should SEC Cede Standards Board Oversight to New Regulator?

Lora Bentley

Investor advocates are a little fidgety given the goings-on with the House Financial Services Committee recently.


For example, the full committee passed legislation that would exempt public companies with a market capitalization of less than $75 million from Sarbanes-Oxley section 404 compliance requirements. It's what small business has wanted for years, but some observers see it as a big step backward.


Last week, the committee was also considering legislation that would move oversight of the Financial Accounting Standards Board from the Securities and Exchange Commission to a new systemic risk regulator, Compliance Week's Tammy Whitehouse reports. She writes:

To remain confident in financial reports, "the process by which accounting standards are developed must be free - both in fact and appearance - of outside influences that inappropriately benefit any particular participant or group of participants in the financial reporting system to the detriment of investors, businesses, and capital markets," [the Center for Audit Quality, the Council of Institutional Investors and an arm of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce told the] committee.

In short, the groups argue, the Financial Accounting Standards Board and its procedures should remain independent of the political process. It's yet another item to add to my legislation watch list.

Add Comment      Leave a comment on this blog post

Post a comment





(Maximum characters: 1200). You have 1200 characters left.




Subscribe to our Newsletters

Sign up now and get the best business technology insights direct to your inbox.