From regulatory compliance to corporate governance structure, everyone is involved
Topic: Mac OS
Hmmmm. More to consider:
1. Sony, JVC, Panasonic, Toshiba etc made VCRs in the 80's with a "record feature" that included a some small disclaimer in the owners manual stating it was illegal to record copyrighted material without permission, but that didn't deter people from using that red record button and breaking the law. Was it illegal to sell VCRs? No. Did they inadvertently encourage people to break the law? Maybe.
2. Dell, Hewlett Packard, Gateway, Compaq, Acer, and even Apple
say their computers come with DVD burners. Now how many unlawful things can people do with those devices? Are we to believe that all DVD burner owners have a home movie collection and that nobody ever buys one to bootleg their favorite movies from Netflix? Instead, should these companies omit the fact their computers come with a device that facilitates abuse of the copyright law? Imagine how much less bootlegging there would be! Is it illegal to advertise DVD burners? No. Are the manufacturers encouraging people to break the law? Maybe.
So how's that different to claiming a computer can run OS X?
Topic: Apple
Apple software works with Apple hardware. Period. And Apple likes it that way
Blog: Mobile Devices: Fish or Fowl, Rock or Mineral, Purpose-Built or General?
Article: The Growing Sophistication of Smartphone App Development
News: Cisco Offers Free iPhone Security App
Related Topics
Desktops and Workstations, Intellectual Property, Mac OS
Software Forum: Information On Demand Virtual ExperienceThis interactive virtual forum presents leading IT experts providing the insights you need to turn your information into a strategic driver for innovation, business optimization and competitive differentiation.
Performance Under Pressure: The State of Enterprise Web Application Quality and AvailabilityThis research study finds that Web application issues are an all-too-common problem and examines these Web-based enterprise application issues from two perspectives: that of an online customer and that of a site manager.

Data management tips and techniques that insure ease of access, comprehensive security and absolute privacy for your invaluable company information.

Applications, management tools and industry advice on how to optimize your data for better business decisions.

Indispensable technologies and best practices to maintain your organization's most valuable asset.

Applications that mid-sized businesses can use to improve operational efficiency, accelerate growth, and maintain profitability.
All About Reducing Your IT CostsLooking to cut costs? Use this research-driven Excel tool to pinpoint which IT cost reduction measures best fit your needs.
Six Sigma Framework for ITThis collection of tutorials, calculators, and templates will show you how to apply six sigma thinking to IT service management.
Interesting comments. Here are a few points to consider:
1) Psystar preinstalls & distributes the Mac OS or OSx86 without Apple's authorization, and has pictures of Apple's trademarks on their website. RSOL does not preinstall or distribute Apple's OS, nor does the website contain pictures of Apple's trademark. That's a pretty big difference.
2) How many people (other than overly cautious attorney types like me) actually read software EULA's? How many read warranties? Is it preferrable to conceal certain facts about a product rather than disclose? Agreed, it's just human nature for people to skip over things that are apparently boring or not newsworthy, like contracts or disclaimers. They still serve a purpose nonetheless.
3) Anyone familiar with Section 5 of Apple's Mac OS X EULA? That's a pretty big clue how the software was able to be installed & tested.
4) Is it deceptive for an automaker to claim their vehicle can do 0-60 in 4 seconds, and has a top speed that exceeds the national speed limit? Is it fair to say the automaker encouraged the driver to go out and break the law because they pointed out one of the car's potentially unlawful capabilities? Should the automaker be held responsible if a driver gets a speeding ticket or displays an exhibition of speed when they pull off from a red light? Is it also fair to say more people engage in unlawful speeding because they got the idea from the the automaker? I seriously doubt it.