If CTOs Want to Pay for Open Source, We Should Let Them

Lora Bentley

Paying for open source seems an odd idea to some people. But as Serdar Yegulalp pointed out in his InformationWeek blog, Alfresco VP and CNET News blogger Matt Asay spoke to several CTOs this week who indicated they would rather pay open source companies for proprietary additions or extensions than contribute code. Asay said:

The interesting thing was that while the CTOs looked to open source as an inexpensive means of discovering and evaluating software, all seemed to believe that adding proprietary services or software was the right way to monetize it... Every CTO that spoke up (and it was a very open forum) said that they are happy to pay for proprietary extensions to open-source software.

One of the ideas that came up during Asay's discussion of possibilities was "a feature request marketplace." Yegulalp says this idea deserves further consideration. He points out that such a marketplace could easily be built on top of existing open source marketplace systems, such as SugarExchange, where "people can sell commercial add-ons to SugarCRM."

 

 

The sticking point may not be the fact that too few companies adopt open source, but that the people who need to be involved in the process are not well-enough informed. He says:

I'm guessing the main thing isn't the breadth of adoption alone, but broader knowledge among the right people about the mechanics of an open source endeavor -- including legal departments.

I think he's right.



Add Comment      Leave a comment on this blog post
Nov 17, 2008 8:00 AM The Sugar Refinery The Sugar Refinery  says:
Whilst Open Source is often free (though most companies such as SugarCRM have free and paid for editions even though it is open source), most choose to use the budget saved in licence fees to pay for customisation. That way companies get true benefit from having a solution that fits their individual company rather than taking an off-the-shelf one size fits all approach.As a company specialising in SugarCRM customisation, we can often deliver solutions faster and at a more affordable rate when compared against in-house customisation. This is simply because we understand the application and have experience in customising it.In summary Open Source offers the opportunity to get exactly the solution you want. It isn't free, but it does provide a higher ROI and lower TCO than proprietary solutions. Reply
Nov 21, 2008 4:04 AM kaylee kaylee  says:
I recently came across your blog and have been reading along. I thought I would leave my first comment. I don't know what to say except that I have enjoyed reading. Nice blog. I will keep visiting this blog very often.kayleehttp://www.thinkpadonline.info Reply

Post a comment

 

 

 

 


(Maximum characters: 1200). You have 1200 characters left.

 

null
null

 

Subscribe to our Newsletters

Sign up now and get the best business technology insights direct to your inbox.