<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:clearspace="http://www.jivesoftware.com/xmlns/clearspace/rss" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:opensearch="http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearch/1.1/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Lora Bentley</title>
    <link>http://www.itbusinessedge.com/cm/blogs/bentley</link>
    <description>Comment Feed for Lora Bentley</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 06:36:56 GMT</pubDate>
    <generator>Clearspace 2.5.5 (http://jivesoftware.com/products/clearspace/)</generator>
    <dc:date>2009-11-18T06:36:56Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>RE:&amp;nbsp;Social Media and Risk: Much More than Marketing for Businesses</title>
      <link>http://www.itbusinessedge.com/cm/blogs/bentley/social-media-and-risk-much-more-than-marketing-for-businesses/?cs=37564#comment-34116</link>
      <description>I've done 'reputation management' for a big name in a big business, and while watching the social media space is a daunting task...dominating the first (full) page of Google results for a company name is another vital, and labor intensive element to</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 06:36:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>Sean Mitchell</author>
      <guid>http://www.itbusinessedge.com/cm/blogs/bentley/social-media-and-risk-much-more-than-marketing-for-businesses/?cs=37564#comment-34116</guid>
      <dc:date>2009-11-18T06:36:56Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE:&amp;nbsp;Bilski v. Kappos: Both Sides Have Strengths, Weaknesses</title>
      <link>http://www.itbusinessedge.com/cm/blogs/bentley/bilski-v-kappos-both-sides-have-strengths-weaknesses/?cs=37447#comment-34071</link>
      <description>I think at this point there's a consensus that the SCOTUS will rule that business methods aren't patentable.&amp;nbsp; All that's left to debate is the scope of the ruling since it could very well do away with software and pharmaceutical patents as well.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 02:59:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>Riskable</author>
      <guid>http://www.itbusinessedge.com/cm/blogs/bentley/bilski-v-kappos-both-sides-have-strengths-weaknesses/?cs=37447#comment-34071</guid>
      <dc:date>2009-11-16T02:59:53Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE:&amp;nbsp;Electronic Medical Records Backup Doesn't Have to be Paper</title>
      <link>http://www.itbusinessedge.com/cm/blogs/bentley/electronic-medical-records-backup-doesnt-have-to-be-paper/?cs=37282#comment-34056</link>
      <description>Hi Doc, &amp;nbsp; I am currently looking at an EMR system for our 150 beds facility. The system will cost us roughly $6-7M for a 5 year implementation and that does not include support. I visited practice fusion website and I must say Im a little skeptic.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 17:35:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>User1740769</author>
      <guid>http://www.itbusinessedge.com/cm/blogs/bentley/electronic-medical-records-backup-doesnt-have-to-be-paper/?cs=37282#comment-34056</guid>
      <dc:date>2009-11-13T17:35:54Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE:&amp;nbsp;Electronic Medical Records Backup Doesn't Have to be Paper</title>
      <link>http://www.itbusinessedge.com/cm/blogs/bentley/electronic-medical-records-backup-doesnt-have-to-be-paper/?cs=37282#comment-34055</link>
      <description>If the entire building has no electricity, how will a wireless laptop work? Wouldn't you need a wireless card from say..at&amp;amp;t?</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 16:57:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>User1740769</author>
      <guid>http://www.itbusinessedge.com/cm/blogs/bentley/electronic-medical-records-backup-doesnt-have-to-be-paper/?cs=37282#comment-34055</guid>
      <dc:date>2009-11-13T16:57:06Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE:&amp;nbsp;Electronic Medical Records Backup Doesn't Have to be Paper</title>
      <link>http://www.itbusinessedge.com/cm/blogs/bentley/electronic-medical-records-backup-doesnt-have-to-be-paper/?cs=37282#comment-34002</link>
      <description>Federal funding may be encouraging a move toward EHR, but there's more to it than just installing systems. How can healthcare data pooling lead to a better system? More at  http://www.healthcaretownhall.com/?p=1499</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 03:33:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>Jeremy Engdahl-Johnson</author>
      <guid>http://www.itbusinessedge.com/cm/blogs/bentley/electronic-medical-records-backup-doesnt-have-to-be-paper/?cs=37282#comment-34002</guid>
      <dc:date>2009-11-10T03:33:50Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE:&amp;nbsp;FTC Extends Red Flag Rule Compliance Deadline...Again</title>
      <link>http://www.itbusinessedge.com/cm/blogs/bentley/ftc-extends-red-flag-rule-compliance-deadlineagain/?cs=37211#comment-33996</link>
      <description>Electronic Verification Systems ( EVS ) can help you fulfill your Red Flag plan with our identity verification and authentication  solutions</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 18:41:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>Jay</author>
      <guid>http://www.itbusinessedge.com/cm/blogs/bentley/ftc-extends-red-flag-rule-compliance-deadlineagain/?cs=37211#comment-33996</guid>
      <dc:date>2009-11-09T18:41:22Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE:&amp;nbsp;Electronic Medical Records Backup Doesn't Have to be Paper</title>
      <link>http://www.itbusinessedge.com/cm/blogs/bentley/electronic-medical-records-backup-doesnt-have-to-be-paper/?cs=37282#comment-33948</link>
      <description>Lora: &amp;nbsp; Disaster recovery is much more straightforward with cloud-based EHRs, like Practice Fusion. With these systems, medical records are instantly retrievable from anywhere you can log on to the Internet. So if a flood destroys both the paper</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 00:38:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>Glenn Laffel MD, PhD</author>
      <guid>http://www.itbusinessedge.com/cm/blogs/bentley/electronic-medical-records-backup-doesnt-have-to-be-paper/?cs=37282#comment-33948</guid>
      <dc:date>2009-11-06T00:38:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE:&amp;nbsp;Correcting the Tech Patent Problem</title>
      <link>http://www.itbusinessedge.com/cm/blogs/bentley/correcting-the-tech-patent-problem/?cs=37003#comment-33945</link>
      <description>Mr. Halling, &amp;nbsp; "A working requirement is inconsistent with Adam Smiths division of labor." &amp;nbsp; This does not account for the fact that ideas are really quite cheap. I think of ideas every day. Many of them are patentable. But patenting all of my</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 19:02:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>Cliff Berg</author>
      <guid>http://www.itbusinessedge.com/cm/blogs/bentley/correcting-the-tech-patent-problem/?cs=37003#comment-33945</guid>
      <dc:date>2009-11-05T19:02:28Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE:&amp;nbsp;Correcting the Tech Patent Problem</title>
      <link>http://www.itbusinessedge.com/cm/blogs/bentley/correcting-the-tech-patent-problem/?cs=37003#comment-33944</link>
      <description>Mr. Riley - &amp;nbsp; I think that the issue at hand is how "obvious" a software "invention" is. &amp;nbsp; There are so many cases of "inventions" in which it would be natural to expect that in the course of writing software about the subject of the invention</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 18:52:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>Cliff Berg</author>
      <guid>http://www.itbusinessedge.com/cm/blogs/bentley/correcting-the-tech-patent-problem/?cs=37003#comment-33944</guid>
      <dc:date>2009-11-05T18:52:14Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE:&amp;nbsp;Equipment End of Life: Recycling and Proper E-Waste Disposal</title>
      <link>http://www.itbusinessedge.com/cm/blogs/bentley/equipment-end-of-life-recycling-and-proper-e-waste-disposal/?cs=31496#comment-33939</link>
      <description>Stumbled upon an interesting site, www.global-serve.com, offers complete Global IT Procurement.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 15:03:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>Joeblog20</author>
      <guid>http://www.itbusinessedge.com/cm/blogs/bentley/equipment-end-of-life-recycling-and-proper-e-waste-disposal/?cs=31496#comment-33939</guid>
      <dc:date>2009-11-05T15:03:56Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE:&amp;nbsp;Where Is the Cyber Czar?</title>
      <link>http://www.itbusinessedge.com/cm/blogs/bentley/where-is-the-cyber-czar/?cs=37178#comment-33874</link>
      <description>Nothing but an exhibition of failure. Someone needs to simply teach Obama to count and with him all will realize how frivolous and misled their perceptions and these exploits are.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 21:23:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>lee</author>
      <guid>http://www.itbusinessedge.com/cm/blogs/bentley/where-is-the-cyber-czar/?cs=37178#comment-33874</guid>
      <dc:date>2009-11-02T21:23:54Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE:&amp;nbsp;House Legislators Propose More Sarbox 404 Relief for SMBs</title>
      <link>http://www.itbusinessedge.com/cm/blogs/bentley/house-legislators-propose-more-sarbox-404-relief-for-smbs/?cs=37144#comment-33869</link>
      <description>Yes!&amp;nbsp; Yes!&amp;nbsp; Yes! &amp;nbsp; Yes We Can completely destroy what's left of our sinking economy by saddling the "Small Business Sector" with more costly regulations that will not add one dime of benefit to anyone!&amp;nbsp;  &amp;nbsp; None of these new</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 18:34:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>User1710723</author>
      <guid>http://www.itbusinessedge.com/cm/blogs/bentley/house-legislators-propose-more-sarbox-404-relief-for-smbs/?cs=37144#comment-33869</guid>
      <dc:date>2009-11-02T18:34:52Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE:&amp;nbsp;Google Voice Blocks Fewer Calls, Thanks to Fix</title>
      <link>http://www.itbusinessedge.com/cm/blogs/bentley/google-voice-blocks-fewer-calls-thanks-to-fix/?cs=37096#comment-33860</link>
      <description>I’d like to say my husband has been supportive, but he’s more of an eye roller. Truly, my mom always told me I could do anything I wanted, and I took her word on it. Susan Elizabeth Phillips really got me interested in writing in the romance genre, so</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 23:35:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>dayze shayne</author>
      <guid>http://www.itbusinessedge.com/cm/blogs/bentley/google-voice-blocks-fewer-calls-thanks-to-fix/?cs=37096#comment-33860</guid>
      <dc:date>2009-10-31T23:35:18Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE:&amp;nbsp;Online Privacy Resources Abound -- Choose Carefully</title>
      <link>http://www.itbusinessedge.com/cm/blogs/bentley/online-privacy-resources-abound----choose-carefully/?cs=15459#comment-33859</link>
      <description>I have to say IAPS is not a good example of a company in this industry. Their solution has massive issues staying online, their process of informing their customers is basically not to and when you do finally get an answer from their support guys it</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 18:13:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>Nick</author>
      <guid>http://www.itbusinessedge.com/cm/blogs/bentley/online-privacy-resources-abound----choose-carefully/?cs=15459#comment-33859</guid>
      <dc:date>2009-10-31T18:13:09Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE:&amp;nbsp;Google Voice Blocks Fewer Calls, Thanks to Fix</title>
      <link>http://www.itbusinessedge.com/cm/blogs/bentley/google-voice-blocks-fewer-calls-thanks-to-fix/?cs=37096#comment-33840</link>
      <description>So they got in trouble for blocking calls to FreeConferenceCall.com and now they are blocking calls to FreeConferenceCall.com but not residents in the same exchange and that is called a fix. &amp;nbsp; They are still blocking calls to the same people they</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 22:46:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>Epoe</author>
      <guid>http://www.itbusinessedge.com/cm/blogs/bentley/google-voice-blocks-fewer-calls-thanks-to-fix/?cs=37096#comment-33840</guid>
      <dc:date>2009-10-29T22:46:40Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE:&amp;nbsp;Internet Companies: Net Neutrality Will Foster Innovation, Growth</title>
      <link>http://www.itbusinessedge.com/cm/blogs/bentley/internet-companies-net-neutrality-will-foster-innovation-growth/?cs=36797#comment-33806</link>
      <description>It is my feeling that these companies, Facebook, Amazon, Google, etc. are no different then any other big corporation (such as Monsanto in the food industry) that will impose there will on the general public while claiming that Net Neutrality will make</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 15:38:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>Tony</author>
      <guid>http://www.itbusinessedge.com/cm/blogs/bentley/internet-companies-net-neutrality-will-foster-innovation-growth/?cs=36797#comment-33806</guid>
      <dc:date>2009-10-28T15:38:15Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE:&amp;nbsp;Correcting the Tech Patent Problem</title>
      <link>http://www.itbusinessedge.com/cm/blogs/bentley/correcting-the-tech-patent-problem/?cs=37003#comment-33804</link>
      <description>All excellent points Mr. Riley, I would just like to add a coupled of more.&amp;nbsp; First of all we have never had a working requirement in the US – must practice the invention to enforce it.&amp;nbsp; A working requirement is inconsistent with Adam Smiths</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 14:43:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>Dale B. Halling</author>
      <guid>http://www.itbusinessedge.com/cm/blogs/bentley/correcting-the-tech-patent-problem/?cs=37003#comment-33804</guid>
      <dc:date>2009-10-28T14:43:14Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE:&amp;nbsp;Correcting the Tech Patent Problem</title>
      <link>http://www.itbusinessedge.com/cm/blogs/bentley/correcting-the-tech-patent-problem/?cs=37003#comment-33803</link>
      <description>"When I talked to technology attorneys early this year regarding the patent system, most agreed that the system as it exists now is broken..." &amp;nbsp; You must only be talking with attorneys for large tech firms. Sure they think the system is broken</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 14:30:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>staff1</author>
      <guid>http://www.itbusinessedge.com/cm/blogs/bentley/correcting-the-tech-patent-problem/?cs=37003#comment-33803</guid>
      <dc:date>2009-10-28T14:30:45Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE:&amp;nbsp;Correcting the Tech Patent Problem</title>
      <link>http://www.itbusinessedge.com/cm/blogs/bentley/correcting-the-tech-patent-problem/?cs=37003#comment-33797</link>
      <description>“Preston bemoaned patent trolls and noted that patent litigation often affects those far beyond the software and technology industries.” Every patent thief moans about being held accountable for their disreputable conduct. &amp;nbsp; “Case in point is a</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 23:00:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>Ronald J Riley</author>
      <guid>http://www.itbusinessedge.com/cm/blogs/bentley/correcting-the-tech-patent-problem/?cs=37003#comment-33797</guid>
      <dc:date>2009-10-27T23:00:57Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE:&amp;nbsp;HHS to Release Final HITECH 'Meaningful Use' Standard in December</title>
      <link>http://www.itbusinessedge.com/cm/blogs/bentley/hhs-to-release-final-hitech-meaningful-use-standard-in-december/?cs=36932#comment-33771</link>
      <description>HITECH will motivate healthcare entities to maintain robust logs and audit trails recording access to all electronic patient data, whether the data be in email, qualified e-patient records, treatment equipment or otherwise. Compliance will not be easy</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2009 02:50:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>Benjamin Wright</author>
      <guid>http://www.itbusinessedge.com/cm/blogs/bentley/hhs-to-release-final-hitech-meaningful-use-standard-in-december/?cs=36932#comment-33771</guid>
      <dc:date>2009-10-25T02:50:42Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

