Cheating Scandal Shows Sarbox Is Necessary

Lora Bentley

Early this month, news broke that 34 students at Duke's business school face various degrees of punishment for cheating on a take-home exam and other assignments. And apparently those students aren't the only ones who seem to have lost their scruples.


A national survey of business students conducted by a Rutgers professor indicates that 56 percent of graduate business students admitted cheating in the last year. When undegrad students are added to the mix, the number jumps to 74 percent.


Associated Press columnist Rachel Beck says the Duke scandal and the survey results taken together demonstrate the need for a law like Sarbanes-Oxley -- especially when you consider the researcher's explanation for the survey results: Students view "cutting corners" as a skill they will need to use to survive in the real world of business, so they have no qualms about putting it to work in the classroom.


It's an "end justifies the means" mentality that should concern corporate America, Beck says. If they'll do it in school, at the very least they'll be tempted to do it at work. That's why Sarbanes-Oxley and the deterrence culture it creates are crucial.


To those advocating a scaled-back Sarbox, Beck has this to say:

If they think Sarbanes-Oxley is costly and time-consuming, try an Enron-sized fraud trial.

Add Comment      Leave a comment on this blog post
May 17, 2007 3:25 AM Dr. Sachi Sakthivel Dr. Sachi Sakthivel  says:
More than two-third of students admit cheating in classes, and yet less than one-tenth of one percent students are punished for cheating. This emboldens students to cheat when they go to work. SOX needs to be mandatory for all organizations. Reply
May 21, 2007 12:33 PM Jill Jill  says:
SOX is necessary not only for those who want to cheat but largely because "group think" is a problem in large companies. Everyone thinks it is someone elses job to ensure errors/theft don't happen and the company is so large that it is difficult for anyone to see the big picture. Therefore, in many cases, no one is taking the extra steps necessary to prevent errors/fraud from happening. SOX ensures that someone has to take responsibility. Reply

Post a comment





(Maximum characters: 1200). You have 1200 characters left.



Subscribe to our Newsletters

Sign up now and get the best business technology insights direct to your inbox.