Accounting Regulators Clear Path to Standards Convergence

Lora Bentley

In an effort to further facilitate the move from Generally Acceptable Accounting Standards to the International Financial Reporting Standards, the Financial Accounting Foundation board of directors has cut two positions from the Financial Accounting Standards Board, effective July 1. reports the foundation also voted to give more power to the standards board's chairman:

Another of the most debated changes approved by the trustees will vest the FASB chairman, currently Bob Herz, with the authority, "following appropriate consultation," to set the board's agenda, project plans, and priority of project plans. Currently projects are added to or, in rare cases, dropped from the agenda via a full board vote.

The changes were made in spite of heavy opposition, the story says. Critics fear that cutting FASB membership from seven to five members will not increase efficiency in standard setting. They believe it will limit the standards board's ability to reach out to its constituents since fewer members will be "shouldering the ever increasing workload."


But the overarching concern, according to foundation trustees quoted here, is to actively move toward convergence of GAAP and IFRS:

"We took action very much with an eye toward convergence," [FAF Chairman Robert] Denham said. Timothy Flynn, chairman and chief executive of KPMG and a FAF trustee, said that to bring in new members during the convergence process "might slow the process down." ... Some commenters urged the trustees "to wait until we had a clear path and timetable for convergence," said Denham. "That suggests that we should be passive. We believe we should be an active participant and work to create the path."

Add Comment      Leave a comment on this blog post

Post a comment





(Maximum characters: 1200). You have 1200 characters left.




Subscribe to our Newsletters

Sign up now and get the best business technology insights direct to your inbox.