Microsoft Dynamics and the Battle for CRM Market Share

Ann All

Just last week, I wrote about a flock of financial analysts downgrading their ratings on software-as-a-service darling Salesforce.com, citing concerns about sales slowdowns among both traditional on-premise software vendors and Salesforce's SaaS peers.

The authors of this Technology Evaluation Centers piece, who are so bullish on Salesforce that I wonder if they aren't in some way connected to the company, apparently wrote it before the analysts turned in their negative appraisals, which sent Salesforce stock on a downward slide. Still, although the article seems suspiciously skewed in Salesforce's favor, it does offer one a nice rundown of Salesforce's different products, including its activities in the platform-as-a-service (PaaS) space. (You'll have to register to read the article. While it's free, this site required me to enter my user name/password info several times during a single reading. Annoying.)

While the title of the article implies it contains a broad discussion of the competitive landscape of the on-demand CRM market, it focuses almost exclusively on Salesforce vs. Microsoft Dynamics, with a discussion of the strengths and weaknesses of each. Though it only officially launched in April, Dynamics presents one of the most formidable challengers yet to Salesforce's dominance of this market, according to the article's authors.

Working in Dynamics' favor, according to the article:

  • It's priced at least 30 percent less than equivalent offerings from Salesforce (and comparisons offered in the article make it clear that Salesforce charges a premium over not just Dynamics but other alternatives such as Oracle Siebel CRM OnDemand and Sugar CRM Professional On-Demand).
  • Customers will welcome a legitimate alternative to Salesforce.
  • Dynamics integrates with all of the usual Microsoft suspects, including Office, Content Management Server, Mobile and MapPoint.
  • Microsoft is working on a process-oriented, end-to-end CRM approach involving Sharepoint Server, BizTalk, Exchange and other Microsoft technologies that will emphasize not only internal collaboration but collaboration with customers.

Working against Dynamics:

  • As a company strongly oriented toward products, Microsoft will have a tough time adopting the kind of services mentality necessary to make SaaS work.
  • Because Microsoft partners will sell the product, Microsoft won't have the kind of direct connection with its customers that has helped make Salesforce a success.
  • Microsoft can't match the Salesforce interface for ease of use.
  • Because it doesn't have to worry about building market share, Salesforce can focus on offering new functionality and vertical solutions.
  • Microsoft doesn't yet have a directory of third-party, on-demand applications equivalent to Salesforce's AppExchange.

ZDNet blogger Joshua Greenbaum hits on another possible disadvantage for Dynamics in his post about the fluidity of Microsoft's strategy for the product. Though it was once aimed at the upper end of the enterprise software market, Microsoft has now apparently decided to target SMBs instead, largely due to its reluctance to adopt a direct-sales model for Dynamics. (Interestingly, as IT Business Edge blogger Kachina Dunn wrote earlier this year, Microsoft's sales partners are worried their revenues will suffer under a SaaS model.)

 

It's a smart move for Microsoft, though, concludes Greenbaum. There is lots of revenue up for grabs in the mid-market, and its army of resellers should give Microsoft a big boost there. (Unlike the authors of the TEC article, Greenbaum sees Microsoft sales partners as a definite strength.)



Add Comment      Leave a comment on this blog post
Oct 13, 2008 6:04 AM stefan demetz stefan demetz  says:
Dynamics CRM 4 will kick butt in 2009, my company has several > 1k users deals in the pipeline, if MS plays it's hand cleverly (perhaps by providing a free version with reduced functionality a la Sharepoint) Dynamics CRM 4 will steamroll the market.StefanDecatec Reply
Oct 14, 2008 4:14 AM ecentric ecentric  says:
At The Sugar Refinery, we're seeing a big boost in demand for SugarCRM. The current economic climate is forcing more IT managers to consider Open Source solutions and SugarCRM is the market leader in this area. Reply
Oct 14, 2008 9:32 AM David Yack David Yack  says:
The market is just starting to see the advantages of MSCRM 4.0 - The platform strategy of SF is challenging with it's proprietary technology offerings that fail to leverage more common developer skills. With Microsoft's ability to leverage their broad developer toolset as well as integrate enhancements to core products like SQL Server - I don't see how SF can keep up with the innovation going forward as the snowball starts gaining speed.I'm surpised we don't see more talk of SF getting acquired in order to be able to continue their strategy.It's too bad the site you linked to wanted to know my first born, I would have enjoyed reading the article. Maybe they will be nice enough to contact me directly :)Thanks for the postDave Reply
Oct 15, 2008 6:30 AM Chris Chris  says:
I think the issue that all software as a service providers have is that of integration. We are finding a host of customers asking for our help with integration with Salesforce and other online solutions.Microsoft has addressed this primarly with Biztalk for larger customers but again we find that the cost of Biztalk is a problem.I think the key to all products in this space going forward will be integration. Reply
Oct 15, 2008 10:02 AM Ann All Ann All  says:
Thanks for your comment, Dave. I linked to the TEC article reluctantly, as the site's registration process is unusually arduous. Like you, I hope this will bring the matter to their attention, and they'll consider making some changes so it's a bit easier. I'd link to the site more if it was. Also Chris, I agree w/ your take on integration. It never seems as easy as SaaS providers make it out to be. And it's especially important for CRM, since its processes cross so many different areas of an organization. Reply
Dec 22, 2008 3:38 AM Tyler Tyler  says:
We're trying to finish a standalone installation of Microsoft Dynamics CRM 4.0 and frankly it's pretty terrible to get up and running. I don't know why anyone chooses to use it. It certainly looks like SugarCRM should be eating Microsoft's lunch soon in the install market. SugarCRM seems to do everything that Dynamics does both cheaper and better, without the proprietary lock-in that comes standard with Microsoft products. Reply

Post a comment

 

 

 

 


(Maximum characters: 1200). You have 1200 characters left.

 

null
null

 

Subscribe to our Newsletters

Sign up now and get the best business technology insights direct to your inbox.