Alignment, staffing and culture are often more critical than software and apps
The tools define Web 2.0 - wikis, blogs, communities, web services. Clearly these are about collaboration and sharing.
What was Web 1.0 about? Mostly about one-directional information flows by means of "web sites". In the business world these web sites sold products and services.
This is why there is no confusion about the term Web 2.0 (these is a large difference from Web 1.0) though no one has precisely defined it.
This is also why business people are finding it hard to become enthusiastic about Web 2.0 . What exactly do you sell with wikis, blogs, communities, web services ? The answer is not obvious. Hence the absence of excitement.
Application of Web 2.0 necessaryly emerge in areas other than web storefronts (which is so-Web 1.0). Blogs as opinion makers in journalism, wikis for collaboration of multi-geography project teams, communities for advertising (finally something related to selling!), web services for info sharing (what info, why should it be shared, how do I make money on it?).
Unlike traditional versioning, Web 2.0 will never replace Web 1.0. It is really a add-on to Web 1.0.
Some businesses are trying to figure out how Web 2.0 can help them . For instance, insurance companies are experimenting with wikis for helping specialist underwriters collaborate when underwriting high-value risks, healthcare companies are experimenting with wikis for electronic medical records (which the patients and physicians can edit and keep up to date). Quite possible these may reach maturity in a couple of years.
Since we are talking about the enterprise here, I take a slightly different slant but agree with all the sentiment in the article and most of the points in the replies. Http://franciscarden.blogspot.com
WebDesignMiami's post was far more interesting than the article itself. The article say's Web 2.0 isn't living up to expectations, then goes on to say it will reach full adoption levels within 2 years??? That sounds like a whole lot of projects going on and money being spent to reach that point.
WebDesignMiami posted some intersting stuff, so why can't IT Business Edge do the same thing!
Topic: Web Applications
Browser-based apps offer scalability, ease of deployment and sophisticated features
Blog: Oracle's Plans for Java
Article: Safety in the Cloud(s): 'Vaporizing' the Web Application Firewall to Secure Cloud Computing
White Paper: Overlooked Web 2.0 Security Threats and the Seven BPs to Protect Your Business
Related Topics
Innovation, IT Market Analysts, SaaS
Aster Data nCluster: A New Architecture for Data AnalyticsRead this white paper to learn about a forward-looking new design for analytic data requirements, with a focus on scalability, availability, manageability, and rapid innovation.
Virtual Cloud ManagementRead this white paper to learn the importance and features of a sound technology that enables you to connect, relate, measure, and view your services to optimize the management of virtual environments.

Business solutions software that reduce costs, improve operational performance, decrease risk, and strengthen business management processes.

Best-practice tools, strategies and technologies for determining and managing the data you need to make better business decisions.

Comprehensive storage solutions for better data access and retrieval, leading to better-informed business decisions.

Disaster recovery and business continuation that includes encryption, all at a manageable TCO.
All About Reducing Your IT CostsLooking to cut costs? Use this research-driven Excel tool to pinpoint which IT cost reduction measures best fit your needs.
Janco's 2010 IT Salary SurveyThis survey from Janco Associates, Inc., draws on data collected by extensive surveys of businesses throughout the United States and Canada.
For a few good chuckles, I suggest you Google the following and browse the first 20-30 returns:
failures Gartner Group
warnings Gartner Group
Gartner Group expects
Gartner Group predicts
And as for "Web 2.0":
Like so many tech articles posted since Tim O'Reilly coined the term in 2004, this one references "Web 2.0" as if it were something tangible--or at least a concept with clear, concise definition. It is not. In 2006, Web founder Sir Tim Berners-Lee sagely observed that "nobody knows what it means":
http://tinyurl.com/y6ewzy
In 2007, Michael Wesch put together this video that supposedly "explains what Web 2.0 really is about":
http://tinyurl.com/6pdz2q
It is a cool video. But the message is all about XML and how it can be used to separate form and content. There was no mention of CSS and XHTML, but no matter. I was writing XML parsers in the '90s, and XHTML/CSS web design pre-dates "Web 2.0" as well.
And now in 2008, the most honest thing we can say is that "Web 2.0" means whatever the techno-marketeer (ab)using it wants it to mean. Otherwise, why would intelligent people like Isaac O'Bannon still be writing articles asking "What is Web 2.0?":
http://tinyurl.com/5solok
And, why would McKinsey's just-released best-of-breed report entitled "Building the Web 2.0 Enterprise" ...
http://tinyurl.com/6sxls7
... include no attempt at defining the term other than to list the "Web 2.0 Tools" that comprise or enable it? And even there, the chief ingredient is identified only as "Web Services", adding more mystery to the mix as one ethereal term is offered up to explain another.
As originated in an Onstartups.com website design posting...
http://tinyurl.com/576sgs
... "Web 2.0" is like pornography: Nobody has defined it, but you know it when you see it.
Bruce Arnold, Web Designer, Miami Florida
http://www.PervasivePersuasion.com