Backshoring Activities Don't Qualify as a Trend

Ann All

There is no question that interest in backshoring, companies moving some or all of their overseas operations back to the U.S., is growing, driven at least partly by shifting economics that make it as cost-effective to produce some goods in the U.S. as in other countries. We even see instances of Chinese companies opening U.S. operations in an effort to get closer to American customers, though admittedly this activity is dwarfed by the reverse flow of U.S. companies to China.

 

In addition, offshore services providers like India's Wipro and Tata Consultancy Services are expanding their operations in the U.S., and companies like AT&T, Apple and Dell have moved some service jobs back to the U.S. in recent years.

 

So, this is a trend, right? Not so much, say three folks from Booz & Company who authored a recent strategy+business article. Instead, it's the kind of "natural rebalancing" common in any industry as it matures. They write:

The U.S. will, no doubt, gain and lose some ground in the process. Indeed, companies have begun to rethink their offshoring decisions in a way that ultimately will render "offshore" and "onshore" no longer meaningful or relevant. Instead, companies are making choices about the best place to do a given piece of work -- be it offshore, onshore, or nearshore. As this transformation occurs, work is being spread throughout the world and companies are globalizing to keep up. But we're only at the beginning of that process, and we won't witness the full effects for quite some time. Traditional offshoring, as we know it, is by no means dead.

Backshoring decisions are still pretty unusual, note the authors. And indeed, I'd agree that the only reason we hear about instances of Chinese companies establishing outposts in America is because they are so unexpected. The America-to-China model is so common, in contrast, it simply doesn't merit special mention.

 

They cite a survey of more than 600 global companies conducted this year by Duke University, which found that three-quarters of U.S. businesses intend to offshore more customer service operations. This despite evidence that such moves can hurt customer satisfaction ratings. And they offer AT&T as an example of backshoring that didn't work out as planned. After AT&T found it harder than expected to find staff in the U.S., it had to introduce what the authors call "an unanticipated training program." And spend $100 million to do so, according to this bizjournals story.

 


While rising fuel costs do cause companies to re-evaluate offshoring -- -- especially those in industries that transport raw materials to countries like China and finished product back to the U.S. -- they may ultimately lead a broader cross section of companies to opt for offshoring, opine the authors. They write:

Soaring commodity prices will hit not just manufacturers but all industries, making it more important than ever for companies of all types to cut costs rapidly without significant new investments. For example, airlines will be especially harmed by fuel cost increases and will almost certainly conclude that one of the few ways to earn a respectable return with little capital outlay is to offshore service operations.

They also predict a continued movement of R&D activities offshore, as companies realize the need to offer products and services specifically developed for emerging markets. Certainly, that's driving U.S. companies to establish large stakes in those markets. Notable examples include Cisco in India and Dell in China

.



Add Comment      Leave a comment on this blog post
Oct 24, 2008 2:04 AM pesak pesak  says:
str�nky pro mlad Reply
Oct 24, 2008 11:24 AM Eoghan Farquhar Eoghan Farquhar  says:
Back shoring? Now that is a load of xxxx. Why can't the press admit what it is? JOBS COMING HOME...Jobs weren't outsourced - they were given to ALIEN workers in a FOREIGN country.Jobs aren't being backsourced - American jobs are returning to America to be performed by AMERICANS.What? Afraid you might offend some Asians or Europeans? Quit inventing words to do "politically correct" writing. Reply
Oct 24, 2008 11:35 AM Greg Orndorff Greg Orndorff  says:
I completely agree with Eoghan. These companies that are giving American jobs away should ashamed of themselves. It's hypocritical to hear companies talk about loyalty from employees when they are loyal to no one. Reply
Oct 24, 2008 11:42 AM Don Fair Don Fair  says:
Depends on the industry. But as far as Dell and Cisco go, like televisions it won't be long before the Chinese and Indians are doing it for themselves and there wont be a Cisco or Dell. First you give them your trade secrets, then you train them how to run your business then they take it for themselves. I love the comment about AT&T being suprised that they had to train people. You ignore our workers for years and what do you expect. I suppose its the schools fault that they didn't train people to understand your business model? When you can't find engineers or computer people or trades people well, I guess third world status is where we are headed. Thanks greed and 6 month bottom lines. Short sighted behavior leads to long term problems. I am waiting for the outsourcing companies (Cisco, Microsoft, Dell et. al) to go before congress and claim that the Chinese and Indians need trade tariffs on their products because they have unfair advantages and are taking american jobs. Its coming, Harley did it when Japan started taking over the motorcycle market. Although Harley was made mostly overseas. I hope, when the Chinese and Indians start eating the large Corps lunches, that we are smart enough to say, tough luck chumps, you caused it. Reply
Oct 28, 2008 11:55 AM fnatal fnatal  says:
Your article talks about the trend of backshoring, which I think its %*%#., however because of H1-B companies like Tata & Wipro can hire their Indian people at a lower salary here in American soil and still keep American workers out of a job, they also are creating their own employment agencies all over the US which favors H1-B status, further screwing the American worker.. There is no balance and to much political correctness and greed on the part of greedy corporate America and crooked politicians. Reply

Post a comment

 

 

 

 


(Maximum characters: 1200). You have 1200 characters left.

 

null
null

 

Subscribe to our Newsletters

Sign up now and get the best business technology insights direct to your inbox.